Profile: f87a968a...

我有任何多余的现金我兑换成加密货币,一来提升隐私,二来有增值的可能性。不过需要等价格很低很低的时候买入,不能太着急,投资还是需要看中长期,短期很难盈利,尤其现在国内的情况,实体经济变差,以及中国试图发展AI需要大量科研经费,经济一时半会好不料。

这是一个经济很差的时期,youtube上的人天天吐槽经济变差和政府政策,过去从没有这么多中国人关注政治,这能让计算机安全技术蓬勃发展,以及网络技术不断进步。但是政治本身不会改变。

Tor能够防止ip关联追踪,还可以真正的提供隐私。

以及加密货币的发明和使用,各种区块链技术去中心化技术的发明和使用,让我们感觉世界充满希望和光明,这有助于摆脱社交媒体的推送算法让我们感到非常焦虑。

我爱它们。

将私钥和助剂词关联起来,这太美妙了,这是一个美妙的设计。

我觉得币安智能链(Binance Smart Chain)大幅度降低了手续费,对于区块链非常有帮助,同时降低了交易时间。

I believe Binance Smart Chain has significantly reduced transaction fees, which is very beneficial for the blockchain, while also decreasing transaction times.

In traditional cryptocurrency networks, all transaction information is public, including transaction amount, sender and receiver addresses, etc. This means that anyone can track and analyze this information to reveal the user's trading behavior and asset flow. However, Zcash utilizes the zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Verifiable Non-Interactive Parameters) protocol, which allows transactions to be kept private.

Zero-knowledge proofs allow a sender to prove to the network that a fact is true without revealing specific details. In Zcash, this means that the sender can prove that they have enough funds to make a transaction without having to reveal their precise amount. At the same time, the receiver can verify that this fact is true without knowing the identity of the sender and the transaction amount.

Restricting cryptocurrency transactions, how is this done?

Do you use cryptocurrency?

Restricting the flow of funds is very unfree

金融这种东西,确实是有些人带风向,尤其是国内经济形势不好的时候。

引导性的舆论创造"韭菜",理性和谨慎才行。

而且我感觉还有带风向找对象的。真是服了,真的不需要,硬推给我们。哎,无语无语。

I heard it when I was a kid, but not much now. Can this theoretically transmit bitcoins, will there be no interference from man-in-the-middle attacks, hahahaha, but it is a very groundbreaking idea.

I don't know if signal is more suitable, but PGP is still very easy to use.

最近币安被美国政府折腾的不轻。好像美国针对币安很多年了,希望币安能顺利度过一切。我们非常需要一个靠谱的交易平台买入比特币啊。

我现在觉得,OpenAI让我非常焦虑,这么厉害太强大,我很没有安全感了。尽管可以帮我非常多的忙,写很多代码,但是还是让我觉得很焦虑。

我看到抖音在讨论如何追女生这类的事情,挺有意思的,虽然我不打算追而且我还想躲着某些人,但是呢~

听听故事还是蛮有意思的,比那些无聊的政治和舆论有趣多了。

我看好像加拿大不是特别适合投资比特币或者搞什么交易所,最近看到的新闻,他们真的事情好多啊,全是什么政府干预什么的,emmm

另外我觉得多买BNB可能还行,从一年的曲线来看,比特币不怎么出色感觉,BNB曲线还行,只要币安不被美国搞死BNB应该是不错的。

欧盟理事会正在继续讨论一项法律,该法律要求通信服务提供商扫描所有通信记录,包括端对端加密的对话。并且他们现在正在讨论是否还应该包括语音对话。

如果这项法律通过,这实际上意味着通信服务提供商将不得不监测和扫描通过他们的网络传输的所有通信形式,包括私人对话和消息。这引起了隐私保护倡导者的担忧,他们认为此类措施可能导致侵犯公民的隐私权。

值得注意的是,这项法律仍在讨论中,尚未最终确定。

如果欧盟通过这项法律,通信服务提供商可能需要扫描和监视所有的通信记录,包括加密的电子邮件和文件。如果这种情况发生,那么ProtonMail和ProtonDrive也将不会幸免。

我发现surfshark竟然修改了路由表,这种操作非常好。

普通的openvpn配置后很少有人去处理路由表的问题。

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Back in the 1930s and 1940s, there were a lot of capital controls, lending restrictions, securities restrictions, etc. And it was for two different but intertwined reasons.

One obvious reason was that, among countries involved in trade wars or shooting wars, they wanted to reduce capital flows to the enemy.

A second reason was that, due to the war, sovereign debts became so high relative to GDP that they had to inflate away the debt, which was a form of default. It wasn't just 6102; it was a broad range of controls. Carmen Reinhart described it well as “creating a captive audience” in an

IMF Working paper:

“High public debt often produces the drama of default and restructuring. But debt is also reduced through financial repression, a tax on bondholders and savers via negative or belowmarket real interest rates. After WWII, capital controls and regulatory restrictions created a captive audience for government debt, limiting tax-base erosion. Financial repression is most successful in liquidating debt when accompanied by inflation. For the advanced economies, real interest rates were negative ½ of the time during 1945–1980. Average annual interest expense savings for a 12—country sample range from about 1 to 5 percent of GDP for the full 1945–1980 period. We suggest that, once again, financial repression may be part of the toolkit deployed to cope with the most recent surge in public debt in advanced economies.”

-IMF Working Paper No. 2015/007

Unfortunately, as most here know, both conditions are once again present in the 2020s. The US/Europe vs Russia/China contest is providing a useful excuse for governments to crack down on privacy, p2p exchange, money transfer, etc. Meanwhile, western governments have a similar sovereign debt problem that ultimately necessitates inflating the debt away.

Some of this Operation Chokepoint 2.0 stuff is just targeting scammy crypto companies and things like that. And the SEC enforcement actions are also going after crypto securities fraud and so forth. For bitcoiners, those things are not particularly relevant.

But under the surface, the bigger risk is all of the ongoing pressure on privacy, p2p, and the free flow of capital, including tighter bank restrictions and debanking.

Why did the confrontation between Russia, China and the United States cause your privacy to decline? I don’t quite understand.Can you tell me what you understand?

##############################

{

"protocol": "socks",

"settings": {

"servers": [{

"address": "127.0.0.1",

"port": 10086

}]

},

"tag": "tor"

}

##############

{

"type": "field",

"outboundTag": "tor",

"domain": [

"geosite:cn"

],

"enabled": true

},

{

"type": "field",

"outboundTag": "tor",

"ip": [

"geoip:cn"

],

"enabled": true

}

这就是个参考,把国内流量转移到tor上,你需要看看tor的文档,这只是v2ray的分流部分,将国内流量送到tor中。

分流是个有意思的东西,但是tor网络更加强大更加隐私,本质上v2ray还是伪装作用的,真正的匿名还是要靠大蒜和洋葱。

我不知道我为什么要研究这个,只觉得有点闲得没事干了。