Avatar
Cyph3rp9nk
fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e
Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.

I did not mean that maximalists will support this ETF, but that maximalists will suffer the consequences of this ETF.

Thoughts on FIAT

The quality of products is getting lower and lower, or we can't even access products that were once affordable. For example all our grandparents and parents had solid wood furniture, now it is unaffordable to buy this furniture that lasts a lifetime. The same happens with clothes, or worse, with food, healthy food is becoming unaffordable.

People confuse wealth with technology, it is evident that we have more technology than them, but we are not richer, we have much less purchasing power thanks to the extractive system in vertical that supposes the FIAT money.

Very interesting interview with Alex Jones by Tucker Carlson. It is a pity that the example of a cancelled, unbanked and untrained person, does not make apology for Bitcoin and is not on Nostr.

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732897835572461582

Prediction.

Bitcoin maximalists will end up regretting the BlackRock ETF, just read their document, everything will end with a Bitcoin fork chosen by themselves, under what conditions I do not know, but evidently it will not be the founding values of Satoshi Nakamoto.

Fidelity's Spot #Bitcoin ETF has been listed on the DTCC under ticker $FBTC 🤔

ETF Agenda updated

Welcome to Ark's developer hub. Here, you'll find detailed information about the protocol, guidance on providing liquidity, and instructions on how to efficiently spend your coins off-chain in a secure manner.

https://arkdev.info/

nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk has saved bitcoin several times, where were you? Before criticizing a little more humility and above all respect for this gentleman.

I'm sorry I'm in the wrong conversation.

Indeed bitcoin is pseudonymous not anonymous, and becomes anonymous only temporarily through methods such as coinjoin and I say temporarily because if you are not pendiende to mix and match you break the anonymity, it is not viable.

Although I hope that this will be reversed with solutions like ARK.

Not at all, quite the contrary. Taproot for example was enabled quickly thanks to the pressure of developers paid by mining pools or who belonged to mining pools, now with perspective things are clearer, maybe OP_PUSH in OP_IF blocks was not so casual.

Knots has always been my reference as an alternative...there's not much to choose from, really.

Not at all, quite the contrary. Taproot for example was enabled quickly thanks to the pressure of developers paid by mining pools or who belonged to mining pools, now with perspective things are clearer, maybe OP_PUSH in OP_IF blocks was not so casual.

The Bitcoin consensus is not Bitcoin Core, the Bitcoin consensus is the various implementations of the Bitcoin protocol that have their own development plan.

Unfortunately the consensus is very weak as everyone installs and abides by the latest version of Bitcoin Core.

https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information/full-node.html

You'll never know, why should you?

Wasabi went public because they wanted to.

Placing your trust in your third party, especially when your privacy depends on it, is an oxymoron.

Just because you are wrong on one subject does not mean you have to be wrong on all subjects, age teaches you these things.