Avatar
rieger_san
fd3bd65179381f76e8f8e89925e8ba3db6d3b9a2e6bec42a27ebced97cc520a5
Bitcoiner | Kotlin Developer | Diver | My Lightning Node: https://amboss.space/node/03021b14351ac4da9b7aa3f07c0fde25411a125a1d3384430d742733e7530fe5df

Coinjoin is useless when it comes to KYC.

The KYC process identifies you so that specific transactions can be bound to you. Making a Coinjoin doesn’t delete the Database of the exchange. They will always know that you have bought Bitcoin.

A normal transaction is enough, because no one can tell if it’s your address or not. When you tell someone you habe sold the sats p2p no one can prove the information is right or wrong.

A Coinjoin disconnects transactions from each other. That’s good for privacy but not for KYC. You have given your privacy away with the registration.

I would say a normal transaction is much better than a coinjoin when it comes to breaking a KYC link.

A normal transaction is not suspicious, a coinjoin is. But that’s just my point of view

Sats don’t have a KYC flag. So this is completely wrong

There no KYC sats!

The KYC process is bound to a person not to the sats itself.

If I sell “KYC” sats to you p2p then the link is broken. Which makes KYC for Bitcoin extremely useless

Having a lot of relays fix nothing, when a client deletes your list

CoinMarketCap be like 😂

I think Nostr will become the everything “App” that elon is currently failing at nostr:note1z2snjk2xrpkkqxhe4kwswtl5eefhd63lm9s0wgaae0eguul8jjrqapdxvk

I love crunchy things 🤤

I’m far from perfect but I try to become better 😊

I know, it was yesterday’s #zapathon shortcut because my LnURL was broken any I have to fix it today 😅🫣

Do what I say, not what I’m doing 😉

Great #zapathon

GN everyone

More #zaps

More #zapathon

#zap hard till the end of #zapathon