Maybe a DVM could get all the edits and LLM summarize them as a new kind? Then people following that DVM would see the community notes summary by that key.

In that way, people get the freedom to choose their own summarizing algorithms.

Yep, and many clients show the replies without showing the head article in a broken experience.

Mostly because we already use other kinds to be replies in other nips. Kind 1 replies are rarely used outside kind 1 clients. And they break many clients when they are used in other nips. So, it's really not something new that I am proposing. It's just a formalization of what already happens.

Well, let's see if this breaks Nostr or not. People always say I am breaking nostr in every new feature, so, it's nothing new. So far everything people said was going to break nostr only made it better and was adopted by more people later.

I am not ignoring. I just don't agree at all that edits create ANY threat to the protocol.

You follow me because I'm edutainment and I make your feed look less like you're drinking the kool-aid.

The bitchy nagging is just a bonus.

Notes should not be required just like the "other stuff" is not required but it is also in the name of the protocol.

Someone has proposed an edit to my note. That means that they are a dick. Right?