Avatar
ImYour Huckleberry
fef3efbbdf9176f9382a67b4eeb6bc4bfa8f5b4b1b39d7129fe07d97fc17371c
For the moment, let's leave religion out of this discussion. I will come back to it later. All Humans(people), by nature, have the same rights; not dependent on when, where, how, or what gender they are born. These Rights supersede all national affiliations and national laws. These are natural laws. They existed before there were governments and will remain after. First and foremost, All people own themselves. All people are entitled to the fruits of their own labor. All associations, transactions, contracts, agreements, sales, etc. of Any kind, for Any reason must be voluntary. (Non-Aggression Principle or NAP - Aggression/Coercion should not be used to force anyone to do, say, or agree to Anything. The ONLY time aggression may be used is in the defense of the life and rights of yourself (or others) from another party initiating aggression.) Theft of any kind is wrong. These represent my ETHICAL stance on way human society should be. I understand that this model of society does not exist on any large scale today and may not come to exist in my lifetime, but this is something to strive towards. _________________ So, what does this mean and how did I come to these beliefs? Human beings, by nature, have the right of Self Ownership: Nobody else can decide for you how you should live your life. Only You can decide what's best for you. There is no other person, no human authority, higher than yourself in your life. If you own yourself, then every other human being also has that same Self-Ownership. Therefore, You have No right to act as an authority on someone else's life without their consent. You can not tell someone else how to live their life without their consent. You can not use force or coercion on another person in any way, except in the defense of the life or property of another. THINK HARD HERE IF You have no RIGHT to dictate to the life of another person, THEN you have no ability to convey that right to somebody else (e.g. through an election, etc.) For Example: You have no RIGHT to take something that is mine. Since you don't have the RIGHT to take my stuff, you can not give that right to someone else to use on your behalf. So, you can not bestow the RIGHT (which we have already decided you don't have) on the government and call it a Tax. The concept of governance is that the people being governed confer their rights upon authority figures to act on their behalf VOLUNTARILY. But, you can only give what you already have. You CAN NOT confer to another person a right that you do not already have to use/exercise on your behalf. If you are NOT a voluntary participant in a nation, an agent of the government (tax collector, police officer, etc.) can not legitimately come to your house and have the RIGHT to take your stuff because nobody who voted for this person or put that person in charge had the authority to grant that right to begin with. Voluntary Associations: No person should be forced to participate in anything that they do not want to be a part of. That includes but is not limited to: Governments Religions Marriages Armed Forces Businesses Clubs or ANY OTHER group or activity for any reason. If you agree with these beliefs, if you share this ETHICAL stance then you might be surprised to know that you are an Anarchist/Voluntaryist. _______________ I used to say that I am proud to be an American. You can be proud of the people in your country, proud of the accomplishments and advances her people have made, and at the same time recognize that there are flaws inherent to the system. I think that our country was founded on good principles, but, over the years, these principles have been sidelined by the corporate and political interests of this world. At the time this country was conceived there were a great many difficulties to be overcome but there were fewer rules and laws. We believed in individual liberty and created a nation to protect that liberty. The founders did their best, but just as with all other things in this world, advances have been made and new ways of thinking have emerged. The founders did what they thought necessary at the time, but I highly doubt that they would be pleased at what their creation has become. Now, instead of listing the things we are Not allowed to do, it seems we list the things we Are allowed to do. The laws and regulations in place today are oppressive, tyrannical, and unnecessary. The "taxes" the government steals from us are excessive. The "taxes" collected from us are not put to good or even effective use. The use of our armed forces to promote our ECONOMIC interests is deplorable. Our whole system is CORRUPT. IN SHORT, we have turned into the very monster we fought so hard to escape. This Country is in dire need of a MAJOR shift in the way we do things. It is inevitable. If we don't fix the problem, the whole system is going to burn down on its own. And on its way down we will lose more and more of our liberty until it gets to the point where ANYTHING that the powers-that-be offer us will be better than our current situation. I believe that it is still possible to make a difference from within the system, but that it will not happen, so I prepare for the worst. The average American is blind to the problem. The average person cares less about freedom and more about security. Most people these days won't complain unless there is some major shift from their comfort zone. The average person would rather be told what to do than take control of their own fate, make their own decisions, and live with the consequences. They are Sheep. ___________ I am a Christian, not because my family is Christian or because all the cool people are Christian, but because I made that choice for myself after deep thought and study on the subject. Nobody forced me to make this decision. It is not POSSIBLE to force someone to be Christian/Muslim/Buddhist/etc. It is a belief one has. ________________ Do I think that there should be laws prohibiting behavior that I find immoral? Insofar as it does not involve anyone else or their property then No. 1) Speaking specifically about the United States: There is a very clear doctrine from the very beginning of the country that there shall be no officially sanctioned and endorsed religion in the USA. This creates a problem for the enacting and enforcing of laws that are based on moral principles based upon religious teachings and context. Which religion is to be the model for governmental morality? Christianity? Islam? Buddhism? To base a law on "Morality" is in direct conflict with our founding principles. There are many behaviors that I find morally wrong and think are ultimately damaging to the individual and society at large. But as long as those behaviors, decisions, and actions are confined to oneself and other voluntary participants then I do not think the government should be able to declare them legal or illegal. If you allow the government to base it's laws on a particular religious understanding of morality, then later that same government could later use a different religion as the model. We must base our laws on protection of life, liberty, and property only. Limit the government and attempt to prevent it's overreach. 2) Using laws to force morality: I don't believe in legislating morality. I don't think that someone who doesn't steal, simply because it it against the law, is a moral person. They are surely a pragmatic person, but moral? The moral person would not steal, regardless of the law, because they believe it to be wrong. A person's belief or lack thereof in a higher power is not and should not be dependent upon the laws currently in place in society. In fact, it could be argued that obedience to secular laws could make a person complacent and leave them vulnerable to a false sense of eternal security. I don't need laws to know Right from Wrong. __________________ Render unto Caesar... I pay my taxes. I don't want government thugs breaking down my door and hauling me off to a cage because I didn't want to let them steal the fruits of my labor. As long as the situation remains the same here I will continue to pay my taxes.

"The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, … or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press."

--Thomas Jefferson (13 April 1743 - 4 July 1826), POTUS

Letter to Major John Cartwright, 5 June 1824

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #ThomasJefferson #POTUS #2A #2ndAmendment #Equality #Voluntary #1A #1stAmendment #LifeLibertyProperty #FreeSpeech #FreePress

"The power of the sword, say the minority..., is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for the powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from sixteen to sixty. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of Americans."

--Tench Coxe (May 22, 1755 – July 17, 1824)

American political economist and a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress in 1788-1789 & writing under the pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian", Pennsylvania Gazette, 20 February 1788.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tench_Coxe

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #TenchCoxe #Militia #Soldier #2A #2ndAmendment

"Liberty sets the mind free, fosters independence and unorthodox thinking and ideas. But it does not offer instant prosperity or happiness and wealth to everyone. This is something that politicians in particular must keep in mind."

--Boris Yeltsin (Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin; 1 February 1931 - 23 April 2007), President of Russia from 1991 to 1999

Russia and the Independent States (1993) by Daniel C. Diller, p. 446

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Yeltsin

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #BorisYeltsin #BorisNikolayevichYeltsin #Independence

"Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of the government. The history of liberty is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of the limitation of governmental power, not the increase of it."

--Thomas Woodrow Wilson (28 December 1856 - 3 February 1924) POTUS

Speech at New York Press Club, 9 September 1912

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #WoodrowWilson

"No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."

--Gideon John Tucker (10 February 1826 - July 1899)

Final Accounting in the Estate of A. B., 1866

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_J._Tucker

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #GideonJohnTucker #LifeLibertyProperty

"Of course, there are dangers in religious freedom and freedom of opinion. But to deny these rights is worse than dangerous, it is absolutely fatal to liberty. The external threat to liberty should not drive us into suppressing liberty at home. Those who want the Government to regulate matters of the mind and spirit are like men who are so afraid of being murdered that they commit suicide to avoid assassination."

-- Harry S. Truman (8 May 1884 - 26 December 1972), POTUS

address at the National Archives dedicating a shrine for the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, 15 December 1952

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_S._Truman

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #POTUS #FreedomOfReligion #FreedomOfSpeech #1stAmendment #1A #HarrySTruman

"Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits."

--Clarence Thomas (23 June 1948 - living), SCOTUS

Obergefell v. Hodges, pp. 16-17 (dissenting), 26 June 2015

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Thomas

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #ClarenceThomas #ObergefellVHodges #Entitlement #Handouts #Benefits #Freedom

MRS radios are certified for and useable only on GMRS frequencies.

Having a radio capable of transmitting on both the VHF/UHF “Ham Band” and GMRS is far more useful. This may not be certified by the FCC. As with all things in life, attempt this at your own risk.

Baofeng UV-5R This radio works well for an inexpensive option for everyday and other on-body carry context. It can function in a vehicle or as a home base station in a more limited capacity.The Factory reset/unlock for this radio enables use on GMRS frequencies.

GMRS stands for General Mobile Radio Service.

22 designated frequencies in the UHF band from 462.5625 to 467.7250MHz.

These overlap with FRS, which is used on most common Walkie Talkies.

Local Laws apply so know what the laws in your country are before transmitting.

Get factory unlock code for transmitting on unlicensed freq. (GMRS).

Not allowed to ship enabled to both VHF & UHF. Radios must be registered as one or the other in the USA.

How to Factory Reset BaoFeng UV-5R and unlock blocked capabilities.

IYKYK...

#BaoFeng #FactoryReset #Unlock #DualBand #UHF #VHF #Comms #Radio #HamRadio

"The saddest epitaph which can be carved in memory of a vanished liberty is that it was lost because its possessors failed to stretch forth a saving hand while yet there was time."

--George Alexander Sutherland (25 March 1862 - 18 July 1942), SCOTUS

Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 US 141 (dissenting), 1938

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Sutherland

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #GeorgeSutherland #Epitaph #SCOTUS

"The real disturbers of the peace are those who, in a free state, seek to curtail the liberty of judgment which they are unable to tyrannize over."

--Benedictus de Spinoza (Baruch (de) Spinoza; 24 November 1632 - 21 February 1677)

Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, 1675-1976 (published posthumously in 1677)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractatus_Theologico-Politicus

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #BenedictusDeSpinoza #BaruchDeSpinoza #TractatusTheologicoPoliticus #Tyranny #Peace #Judgment

"Namque pauci libertatem, pars magna iustos dominos volunt."

("Few men desire freedom, the greater part desire just masters.")

--Sallust (Gaius Sallustius Crispus; 86 - c. 35 BC)

Histories, IV.67.18

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallust

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #Sallust #Freedom #Servitude

NOW THAT I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION...

I am going to say something that many won't agree with.

It is not incumbent only on the man to maintain the relationship. There are things that both partners will, at times, not want to do that are necessary to maintain the relationship. These things will be different for different people. You need to find out what needs your partner has and do your best to meet them.

One thing that is a big deal breaker in relationships is sexual gratification. When one partner doesn't "feel like it" and the other wants it there can be hurt feelings, misunderstandings, anger, doubt and a whole lot of undesirable consequences.

Now don't misunderstand what I am saying. Occasional mismatches in desire/libido are to be expected. The problem arises when it becomes more than occasional and begins to feel like the norm. Sometimes, to preserve the relationship, it is better to put your own desires aside for a while and meet the needs of your partner.

I can only speak from my personal experience, so take this with a grain of salt. When my wife doesn't "feel like it" for extended periods of time it makes me start to question her attraction to me and her commitment to the marriage. The longer it goes the more I get concerned. This is true even though we have had conversations about our commitment to each other, our marriage, our kids, etc. and reaffirmed those commitments regularly. Still, when there is no physical expression of that attraction and commitment there is an undeniable thought in my mind that maybe...

Sex is wonderful.

Sex should ALWAYS be consensual.

Sex should not just be a treat; it should be a frequent thing between a man and wife.

Sex should NEVER be withheld as punishment.

Sex should NEVER be used as a bargaining chip.

and sometimes,

Sex should be consented to even when you don't desire it at that particular time.

It goes both ways. This is for both men and women.

"...because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control..."

1 Cor 2:7-5 NASB

#Marriage #Sex #Biblical #Bible #Relationship #Commitment #Husband #Wife #Monogamous

https://youtu.be/rj9wmI_DmLM

"It is incorrect to think of liberty as synonymous with unrestrained action. Liberty does not and cannot include any action, regardless of sponsorship, which lessens the liberty of a single human being. To argue contrarily is to claim that liberty can be composed of liberty negations, patently absurd. Unrestraint carried to the point of impairing the liberty of others is the exercise of license, not liberty. To minimize the exercise of license is to maximize the area of liberty. Ideally, government would restrain license, not indulge in it; make it difficult, not easy; disgraceful, not popular. A government that does otherwise is licentious, not liberal."

--Leonard Edward Read (26 September 1898 - 14 May 1983), founder of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)

Government—An Ideal Concept, Wednesday, September 26, 2018

(fulltext) https://fee.org/resources/governmentan-ideal-concept/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Read

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #LeonardRead #Equality #Licentious #Liberal

"The philosophy of anarchism is included in the word "Liberty"; yet it is comprehensive enough to include all things else that are conducive to progress. No barriers whatever to human progression, to thought, or investigation are placed by anarchism; nothing is considered so true or so certain, that future discoveries may not prove it false; therefore, it has but one infallible, unchangeable motto, "Freedom." Freedom to discover any truth, freedom to develop, to live naturally and fully."

--Lucy Parsons (Lucy Eldine Gonzalez Parsons, born Lucia Carter; 1851 - March 7, 1942)

The Principles of Anarchism, A lecture printed without date of publication, c. 1890

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Parsons

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #LucyParsons #Anarchism #Freedom

"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."

--Thomas Paine (born Thomas Pain; 9 February 1737 - 8 June 1809)

Dissertation on First Principles of Government,1795

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #ThomasPaine #Oppression #Precedent

#SituationalAwareness #FAFO #PayAttention #Defender #SheepDog