Avatar
ImYour Huckleberry
fef3efbbdf9176f9382a67b4eeb6bc4bfa8f5b4b1b39d7129fe07d97fc17371c
For the moment, let's leave religion out of this discussion. I will come back to it later. All Humans(people), by nature, have the same rights; not dependent on when, where, how, or what gender they are born. These Rights supersede all national affiliations and national laws. These are natural laws. They existed before there were governments and will remain after. First and foremost, All people own themselves. All people are entitled to the fruits of their own labor. All associations, transactions, contracts, agreements, sales, etc. of Any kind, for Any reason must be voluntary. (Non-Aggression Principle or NAP - Aggression/Coercion should not be used to force anyone to do, say, or agree to Anything. The ONLY time aggression may be used is in the defense of the life and rights of yourself (or others) from another party initiating aggression.) Theft of any kind is wrong. These represent my ETHICAL stance on way human society should be. I understand that this model of society does not exist on any large scale today and may not come to exist in my lifetime, but this is something to strive towards. _________________ So, what does this mean and how did I come to these beliefs? Human beings, by nature, have the right of Self Ownership: Nobody else can decide for you how you should live your life. Only You can decide what's best for you. There is no other person, no human authority, higher than yourself in your life. If you own yourself, then every other human being also has that same Self-Ownership. Therefore, You have No right to act as an authority on someone else's life without their consent. You can not tell someone else how to live their life without their consent. You can not use force or coercion on another person in any way, except in the defense of the life or property of another. THINK HARD HERE IF You have no RIGHT to dictate to the life of another person, THEN you have no ability to convey that right to somebody else (e.g. through an election, etc.) For Example: You have no RIGHT to take something that is mine. Since you don't have the RIGHT to take my stuff, you can not give that right to someone else to use on your behalf. So, you can not bestow the RIGHT (which we have already decided you don't have) on the government and call it a Tax. The concept of governance is that the people being governed confer their rights upon authority figures to act on their behalf VOLUNTARILY. But, you can only give what you already have. You CAN NOT confer to another person a right that you do not already have to use/exercise on your behalf. If you are NOT a voluntary participant in a nation, an agent of the government (tax collector, police officer, etc.) can not legitimately come to your house and have the RIGHT to take your stuff because nobody who voted for this person or put that person in charge had the authority to grant that right to begin with. Voluntary Associations: No person should be forced to participate in anything that they do not want to be a part of. That includes but is not limited to: Governments Religions Marriages Armed Forces Businesses Clubs or ANY OTHER group or activity for any reason. If you agree with these beliefs, if you share this ETHICAL stance then you might be surprised to know that you are an Anarchist/Voluntaryist. _______________ I used to say that I am proud to be an American. You can be proud of the people in your country, proud of the accomplishments and advances her people have made, and at the same time recognize that there are flaws inherent to the system. I think that our country was founded on good principles, but, over the years, these principles have been sidelined by the corporate and political interests of this world. At the time this country was conceived there were a great many difficulties to be overcome but there were fewer rules and laws. We believed in individual liberty and created a nation to protect that liberty. The founders did their best, but just as with all other things in this world, advances have been made and new ways of thinking have emerged. The founders did what they thought necessary at the time, but I highly doubt that they would be pleased at what their creation has become. Now, instead of listing the things we are Not allowed to do, it seems we list the things we Are allowed to do. The laws and regulations in place today are oppressive, tyrannical, and unnecessary. The "taxes" the government steals from us are excessive. The "taxes" collected from us are not put to good or even effective use. The use of our armed forces to promote our ECONOMIC interests is deplorable. Our whole system is CORRUPT. IN SHORT, we have turned into the very monster we fought so hard to escape. This Country is in dire need of a MAJOR shift in the way we do things. It is inevitable. If we don't fix the problem, the whole system is going to burn down on its own. And on its way down we will lose more and more of our liberty until it gets to the point where ANYTHING that the powers-that-be offer us will be better than our current situation. I believe that it is still possible to make a difference from within the system, but that it will not happen, so I prepare for the worst. The average American is blind to the problem. The average person cares less about freedom and more about security. Most people these days won't complain unless there is some major shift from their comfort zone. The average person would rather be told what to do than take control of their own fate, make their own decisions, and live with the consequences. They are Sheep. ___________ I am a Christian, not because my family is Christian or because all the cool people are Christian, but because I made that choice for myself after deep thought and study on the subject. Nobody forced me to make this decision. It is not POSSIBLE to force someone to be Christian/Muslim/Buddhist/etc. It is a belief one has. ________________ Do I think that there should be laws prohibiting behavior that I find immoral? Insofar as it does not involve anyone else or their property then No. 1) Speaking specifically about the United States: There is a very clear doctrine from the very beginning of the country that there shall be no officially sanctioned and endorsed religion in the USA. This creates a problem for the enacting and enforcing of laws that are based on moral principles based upon religious teachings and context. Which religion is to be the model for governmental morality? Christianity? Islam? Buddhism? To base a law on "Morality" is in direct conflict with our founding principles. There are many behaviors that I find morally wrong and think are ultimately damaging to the individual and society at large. But as long as those behaviors, decisions, and actions are confined to oneself and other voluntary participants then I do not think the government should be able to declare them legal or illegal. If you allow the government to base it's laws on a particular religious understanding of morality, then later that same government could later use a different religion as the model. We must base our laws on protection of life, liberty, and property only. Limit the government and attempt to prevent it's overreach. 2) Using laws to force morality: I don't believe in legislating morality. I don't think that someone who doesn't steal, simply because it it against the law, is a moral person. They are surely a pragmatic person, but moral? The moral person would not steal, regardless of the law, because they believe it to be wrong. A person's belief or lack thereof in a higher power is not and should not be dependent upon the laws currently in place in society. In fact, it could be argued that obedience to secular laws could make a person complacent and leave them vulnerable to a false sense of eternal security. I don't need laws to know Right from Wrong. __________________ Render unto Caesar... I pay my taxes. I don't want government thugs breaking down my door and hauling me off to a cage because I didn't want to let them steal the fruits of my labor. As long as the situation remains the same here I will continue to pay my taxes.

Sometimes the posts won't populate until you change tabs and then come back.

Another thing,

After you expand an article to read it, you can't collapse it back down. That is a minor thing.

Well for one thing, the notifications are buggy,

I am unsatisfied with #Amethyst as my #NOSTR android #Client. Any suggestions for a better app?

Are #FollowPacks votable?

I am unsure what these are. It sounds like these are curated lists of accounts associated with "xyz" that you can add to your follow list.

Who curates them? Do you rate the accounts in the list as a #CrowdSourced kind of thing? Up-vote/Down-vote and high enough ratings get included?

I just watched this.  I am not a Roman Catholic,  but this was a well made and captivating movie. However,  the ending was biblically unsatisfactory.

Even if I held to the Roman Catholic teachings,  I could not endorse the person that ends up being chosen at the end.  The whole movie leads up to a priest making the wrong choice and another priest, who should not be a priest at all, getting elected pope contrary to clear biblical teaching.

This movie promotes a view at the end that I think is wrong. I can not recommend this movie.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt20215234/

#Conclave #RomanCatholic #Pope #Propaganda #GenderRoles #Elder #Deacon #Preacher #Priest #Bible

Educators obstructing investigations into child abuse and sexual assault of their students and destroying evidence.

https://youtu.be/4WxAfnpqvhQ?si=b086F-ZygTYZcA0i

#Rape #ChildAbuse #Obstruction #Teachers #Administrators #SVU

#TuckerCarlson interviewing #PatrickLancaster

Patrick has been living in and reporting the ongoing conflicts in eastern Ukraine. He has been embedded in the Russian armed forces since the beginning. A lot of valuable information is discussed here...

#Ukraine #Russia #War #Donetsk #Luhansk #Crimea #Reporter #Journalist #Press

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1915814777709830218?s=19

I am a big fan of #TheExpanse and am happy to see more content comming to the franchise. Thoughts?

https://screenrant.com/new-expanse-amos-sequel-comic-revenge-story/

PSA: Just a friendly reminder to NEVER EVER send your login credentials via any method to any communication asking for them. If there is ANY doubt then initiate contact with the original company via previously established lines of communication, NOT links in emails or other messages. Also, don't share Authentication codes (OAuth, OpenID Connect, JSON Web Tokens (JWT), SAML, and WebAuthn, etc.) as they can be copied and used maliciously.

Be smarter than the #PHISHING attack. Most malicious activity can be traced back to poor personal security. Never open links or download files that get sent to you referring to account services or other important looking warnings/opportunities. Always initiate your contact by going to the original company website. Do your homework in advance. Have a way to contact them before you get targeted.

phishing:

the fraudulent practice of sending emails or other messages purporting to be from reputable companies in order to induce individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords and credit card numbers.

#Phishing #Hacking #Scam #SocialEngineering #IdentityTheft #Gmail #Account #Official #PSA

_____________________________________

This is an excerpt from an article about Google/Gmail but it could be just about any other company as well:

"You will receive a flood of malicious phishing emails though, despite Google’s assurance that its defenses now filter out 99% of these. And you do need to change your account settings to ensure you add a passkey and that you don’t rely on SMS two-factor authentication. This is being phased out, but you should move faster and change today.

More importantly, these sophisticated attacks on Gmail users that pretend to be from Google all rely on two false premises: that Google’s support staff may reach out to you by email, phone or message; and if you ever do receive an email or message relating to an account issue, that Google may “ask for any of your account credentials — including your password, one-time passwords [or] confirm push notifications.” The same is true of the company sending links to pages where you enter your credentials — it will not.

Last time there was this furor over a similar attack, Google asked me to “reiterate to your readers that Google will not call you to reset your password or troubleshoot account issues.” And it has reissued that warning in the wake of this latest attack. But the danger is this simple advice is drowned out by the technicalities of 0Auth and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) checks to authenticate senders, including Google itself. "

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2025/04/25/google-confirms-gmail-update-how-to-keep-your-email-account/

This podcast might not be in your normal interest group, but this topic is definitely one that should interest you.  Maximizing tax wrote offs from a home office.  Most of you already know you can do this,  but maybe not all the tricks.  They can add up pretty quickly.

Understanding the home office deduction - Matt Sercely

Starting at 10 min 26 sec

https://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/?powerpress_pinw=48694-podcast

#Tax #Deduction #WriteOff #HomeOffice #Mileage #Utilities #IRS #TSPC #TheSurvivalPodcast

How do you know when you are on the right path in your relationships?

Are your actions motivated by a desire to avoid wrath or a desire to bring joy?

At first glance they may seem like the same thing, but it is the perspective and underlying emotions that count.

Actions are caused by intent like smoke is caused by a fire. Think on your Christian walk. You don't do and say the "Christian" things because you are scared (at least that shouldn't be the reason). Rather, you do and say those things in an attempt to please God and bring him joy. You do those things out of gratitude not out of fear. This should be our example in our relationships with those we love.

As a wise one once said, "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." Our motivation should never be fear. If it is, then that relationship is unhealthy and needs to be tended to. Seek to bring joy to those you love. This attitude will benefit you as well as those you love.

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” John 13:34-35

" 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself" Mark 12:30-31

#Relationship #Advice #Bible #Love #Fear #Attitude #Motivation

I would love to have been there...

Wow.

https://youtu.be/zxziCXI0IvU

https://open.spotify.com/track/6u2N3zMvMTe2nLiG8xwkQw?si=tCG7E9ZqQ6OgFtsSTQ-e_g

#AgnuDei #Hillsong #KristianStanfill #Passion #Passion2024 #Worship #Christ #Jesus #Christian

QUERRY: There were recent articles about changes to firefox relating to privacy and security. please find and summarize these articles.

GROK3:

Overall Analysis

The February 2025 updates to Firefox’s TOU and Privacy Notice have stirred significant controversy due to ambiguous language suggesting broader data use rights. Mozilla’s clarifications and revisions aim to reassure users that its privacy practices haven’t fundamentally changed, but the removal of strong anti-data-selling promises and vague terms have eroded trust. Key privacy and security features remain intact, including:

• Enhanced Tracking Protection: Blocks trackers, cookies, and fingerprinting, with Strict and Custom modes for advanced users.

• DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH): Encrypts DNS requests, with logs deleted within 24 hours.

• Global Privacy Control (GPC): Replaces DNT to signal privacy preferences, though adoption is uncertain.

• OHTTP and Encryption: Protects against fingerprinting and secures data transmission.

However, users are advised to:

• Disable telemetry in Privacy & Security settings.

Use Strict Enhanced Tracking Protection, acknowledging potential site breakage.

• Enable GPC via “about:config” (privacy.globalprivacycontrol.enabled = true).

• Consider privacy-focused extensions like uBlock Origin.

While Mozilla maintains Firefox’s position as a privacy leader, the backlash highlights user sensitivity to policy changes. Alternatives like Brave or Tor are suggested for those seeking stricter privacy, but Firefox remains a strong mainstream option with proper configuration.

Note: Claims about USAID surveillance (X posts) lack credible evidence and should be disregarded unless substantiated. For the latest details, users should check Mozilla’s official Privacy Notice (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/) and adjust settings accordingly.

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

Recent articles from early 2025 highlight significant updates to Mozilla Firefox’s privacy and security policies, particularly around its Terms of Use (TOU) and Privacy Notice, which have sparked user concerns and debates. Below is a summary of key articles discussing these changes, focusing on the most relevant and recent developments:

1. Mozilla’s New Firefox Terms Spark Privacy Concerns (Medium, April 17, 2025)

Summary: This article discusses the controversy surrounding Mozilla’s updated Firefox TOU and Privacy Notice introduced in February 2025. The new terms grant Mozilla a “worldwide, royalty-free license” to use user-input data, raising fears that Mozilla might be shifting toward data monetization. The policy also allows Mozilla to modify terms without explicit user consent, with continued use implying acceptance. Users are concerned about data sharing with third-party partners, even if anonymized, and the lack of a clear opt-out mechanism. Some users are considering switching to alternatives like Brave or Chrome, though Mozilla insists it remains committed to privacy. The article suggests Mozilla may be exploring a freemium model, potentially charging for advanced privacy or AI features, which could damage its privacy-friendly reputation.

Key Points:

• First-ever legally binding TOU for Firefox, replacing informal privacy commitments.

• Vague language about data use has fueled distrust, with no clear reversal despite clarifications.

• Industry speculation about new revenue streams beyond Mozilla’s Google partnership.

_________________________________________

2. The Firefox I Loved Is Gone - How to Protect Your Privacy on It Now (ZDNET, March 4, 2025)

Summary: Written by Steven Vaughan-Nichols, this article expresses disappointment over Mozilla’s shift in privacy practices, particularly the February 2025 TOU and Privacy Notice updates. It notes the removal of the “Do Not Track” (DNT) feature, replaced by Global Privacy Control (GPC), which aims to support privacy laws like California’s CCPA and the EU’s GDPR but faces uncertain website adoption. The article criticizes Mozilla for granting itself broader control over user data, moving away from its earlier promise of never selling data. It provides practical steps to enhance privacy, such as enabling GPC, using DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH), and switching to privacy-focused search engines like DuckDuckGo.

Key Points:

• Mozilla’s new policies allow more data collection, prompting user backlash.

• GPC adoption is questionable, similar to DNT’s failure.

• Recommendations include disabling telemetry, using DoH, and exploring alternatives like Brave or Tor for maximum privacy.

_________________________________________

3. Mozilla Rewrites Firefox’s Terms of Use After User Backlash (TechCrunch, March 3, 2025)

Summary: This article details Mozilla’s response to user outrage over the February 2025 TOU, which initially suggested Mozilla could claim rights to user data. Critics highlighted a clause granting Mozilla a “nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license” to use data input into Firefox. Mozilla clarified that the terms don’t alter its data practices and aren’t driven by a desire to sell data. Following backlash, Mozilla revised the TOU to explicitly state it doesn’t claim ownership of user data and removed references to the Acceptable Use Policy to reduce confusion. The article notes that Mozilla’s removal of blanket “we don’t sell data” claims stems from evolving legal definitions of “sale” under laws like the CCPA.

Key Points:

• Revised TOU clarifies limited scope of data use, addressing misinterpretations.

• Legal definitions of “data sale” prompted cautious language changes.

• Mozilla maintains that its Privacy Notice limits data use, but trust remains strained.

_________________________________________

4. Mozilla Responds After Terms of Usage, Privacy Policy Change (The Register, March 1, 2025)

Summary: This article reports on Mozilla’s attempt to clarify the February 2025 TOU and Privacy Notice after widespread criticism. The original terms suggested Mozilla could use user data broadly, prompting accusations of betraying its privacy ethos. Mozilla’s VP of Firefox Product, Ajit Varma, issued an update stating the company doesn’t sell data in the conventional sense and revised the TOU to clarify no ownership over user data is claimed. The article notes Mozilla’s shift from claiming “we never sell your data” due to broad legal definitions of “sale.” It also mentions alternative Firefox-based browsers like Waterfox, LibreWolf, and Zen as options for privacy-conscious users.

Key Points:

• Mozilla’s initial TOU wording caused confusion, leading to a swift revision.

• The company’s privacy commitment has softened, removing strong anti-data-selling language.

• Suggests exploring Firefox forks for users seeking stricter privacy.

_________________________________________

5. An Update on Our Terms of Use (The Mozilla Blog, February 28, 2025)

Summary: Mozilla’s official blog post addresses concerns about the new TOU and Privacy Notice. It emphasizes that Mozilla doesn’t sell user data in the traditional sense and collects data only to improve Firefox’s functionality, such as optional ads or sponsored search suggestions. The post explains that the shift away from “we never sell your data” reflects broad legal definitions of “sale” under laws like the CCPA. Mozilla highlights built-in privacy features like Enhanced Tracking Protection and user-configurable settings to maintain trust.

Key Points:

• Mozilla collects anonymized or aggregated data for optional features, with privacy-preserving technologies like OHTTP.

• Users can opt out of data collection via settings.

• Legal compliance drove cautious wording, not a change in data practices.

_________________________________________

6. Mozilla Firefox Privacy Policy Update 2024: Key Changes and Security Implications (CyberSecureFox, March 10, 2025)

Summary: This article analyzes the February 2025 privacy policy updates from a security perspective, concluding that Firefox remains a privacy-focused browser despite the controversy. The updates maintain strong protections like data encryption, strict access controls, and transparent data handling. The article advises users to review privacy settings to understand control options, suggesting Mozilla’s approach balances modern privacy challenges with user trust.

Key Points:

• Policy updates adapt to digital advertising and privacy regulations without compromising core protections.

• Firefox’s security features, like tracking protection, remain robust.

• Encourages users to customize settings for optimal privacy.

_________________________________________

Additional Context from Other Sources

• Firefox Privacy Notice (Mozilla, February 27, 2025): Mozilla’s updated Privacy Notice details data collection for functionality, security, and optional features. It emphasizes user control through settings, Enhanced Tracking Protection, and features like DNS-over-HTTPS and OHTTP to combat fingerprinting.

• X Posts (April 2025): Sentiment on X reflects distrust, with users citing concerns about Mozilla’s data use for advertising or AI training and unverified claims about USAID surveillance ties. These claims lack evidence and should be treated as inconclusive.

#Mozilla #Firefox #Browser #Privacy #EULA #Tracking #Encryption #Telemetry #Security

I originally asked:

what is the best mainstream privacy protecting browser

Then I asked:

considering these articles, does your recomendation change?

GROK3:

Considering the recent articles about Mozilla Firefox’s February 2025 Terms of Use (TOU) and Privacy Notice updates, my recommendation for the best mainstream privacy-protecting browser remains Mozilla Firefox, but with caveats and specific steps to maximize privacy. The updates have raised valid concerns about Mozilla’s data practices, but Firefox still offers the strongest balance of privacy, usability, and customization among mainstream browsers (Chrome, Edge, Safari, Opera). Below, I address how the articles impact this recommendation and provide updated guidance.

Why Firefox Remains the Best Choice

• Core Privacy Features Intact:

• • Despite the controversial TOU wording, articles (e.g., CyberSecureFox, Mozilla Blog) confirm Firefox retains robust privacy tools like Enhanced Tracking Protection (blocks trackers, cookies, and fingerprinting), DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH), and OHTTP for anonymized data handling. These features surpass Chrome’s and Edge’s privacy offerings and rival Safari’s, which is limited to Apple ecosystems.

• • The shift from “Do Not Track” to Global Privacy Control (GPC) aligns with modern privacy laws (ZDNET, March 4, 2025), though GPC’s effectiveness depends on website adoption.

• Open-Source Advantage:

• • Firefox’s open-source nature (auditable code) ensures transparency, a point not contradicted by the articles. This contrasts with Chrome and Edge (proprietary) and even Safari (closed-source), making Firefox more trustworthy for privacy-conscious users.

• User Control:

• • Mozilla’s Privacy Notice (February 27, 2025) and revised TOU (TechCrunch, March 3, 2025) emphasize user-configurable settings, allowing opt-outs for telemetry, sponsored content, and data collection for optional features. This level of control is unmatched by Chrome or Edge and exceeds Opera’s.

• Mainstream Usability:

• • Unlike niche browsers (Brave, Tor, LibreWolf), Firefox balances privacy with compatibility and performance for everyday use. Tor is too slow for mainstream needs, Brave’s crypto model may not appeal to all, and LibreWolf sacrifices functionality (The Register, March 1, 2025).

Impact of the Articles on the Recommendation

The articles highlight concerns that temper Firefox’s privacy reputation:

• Ambiguous TOU Language: The initial TOU’s “worldwide, royalty-free license” clause (Medium, April 17, 2025) suggested Mozilla could broadly use user data, raising fears of monetization or AI training. While Mozilla clarified and revised the TOU to state it doesn’t claim data ownership (TechCrunch, March 3, 2025), the vague language and removal of “we never sell your data” promises (due to legal definitions of “sale” under CCPA) have eroded trust.

• Data Collection Scope: The updated Privacy Notice allows anonymized/aggregated data collection for optional features (e.g., ads, sponsored search suggestions), which some users find inconsistent with Mozilla’s non-profit ethos (ZDNET, March 4, 2025).

• User Backlash: Sentiment on X and articles (Medium, The Register) shows distrust, with some users exploring alternatives like Brave or Firefox forks (Waterfox, LibreWolf).

However, these concerns don’t outweigh Firefox’s advantages:

• Mozilla’s clarifications confirm no fundamental shift in data practices, and data collection remains limited to improving Firefox (Mozilla Blog, February 28, 2025).

• Revised TOU addresses misinterpretations, explicitly limiting data use scope.

• Firefox’s privacy features (e.g., Strict mode, DoH) remain stronger than Chrome, Edge, or Opera, and its open-source nature mitigates risks of hidden data practices, unlike Safari.

Comparison with Alternatives

• Google Chrome: Collects extensive user data for ads, making it the least privacy-friendly (unchanged by articles).

• Microsoft Edge: Shares data within Microsoft’s ecosystem, with weaker tracking protection than Firefox.

• Safari: Strong privacy (Intelligent Tracking Prevention), but closed-source and Apple-only. The articles don’t impact Safari’s standing, but its lack of customization keeps it behind Firefox.

• Opera: Built-in VPN and ad blocker are appealing, but weaker fingerprinting protection and data collection by its parent company make it less private.

• Brave: A strong alternative with out-of-the-box privacy (automatic tracker blocking, Tor integration), but its Chromium base (Google influence) and crypto rewards system may deter mainstream users. The articles make Brave more appealing for privacy purists, but Firefox’s customization keeps it ahead for mainstream use.

• Tor/LibreWolf: Too niche for mainstream users due to speed (Tor) or reduced functionality (LibreWolf).

Updated Recommendations for Using Firefox

To address the concerns raised in the articles and maximize privacy, users should take these steps:

• Enable Strict Enhanced Tracking Protection:

Settings > Privacy & Security > Enhanced Tracking Protection > Strict. Note: May break some sites; whitelist as needed.

• Disable Telemetry:

Settings > Privacy & Security > Firefox Data Collection > Uncheck all options (“Allow Firefox to send technical and interaction data” and “Allow Firefox to send crash reports”).

• Enable Global Privacy Control (GPC):

Type about:config in the address bar, search for privacy.globalprivacycontrol.enabled, and set to true. This signals privacy preferences to websites (ZDNET, March 4, 2025).

• Use DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH):

Settings > Privacy & Security > DNS over HTTPS > Enable (select a trusted provider like Cloudflare or NextDNS). Logs are deleted within 24 hours.

• Install Privacy Extensions:

Add uBlock Origin (ad/tracker blocker), Privacy Badger (automatic tracker blocking), and HTTPS Everywhere (forces secure connections).

• Opt Out of Sponsored Features:

Disable sponsored suggestions in Settings > Home > Firefox Home Content.

• Pair with a VPN:

Firefox doesn’t hide your IP, so use a trusted VPN (e.g., ProtonVPN, NordVPN) for anonymity.

• Regularly Check Privacy Settings:

Review Mozilla’s Privacy Notice (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/) for updates, as the articles suggest ongoing policy evolution.

When to Consider Alternatives

If Absolute Privacy Is Critical: Switch to Brave for stronger out-of-the-box privacy or Tor for anonymity, though Tor is impractical for daily use.

If Avoiding Mozilla Entirely: Consider LibreWolf (a hardened Firefox fork) for similar features with stricter privacy defaults, but expect potential compatibility issues.

If Locked into Apple Ecosystem: Safari is a solid alternative, though less customizable.

Conclusion

The articles reveal a misstep in Mozilla’s communication, with ambiguous TOU language and a softened stance on data selling that damaged user trust. However, Mozilla’s revisions, clarifications, and unchanged privacy features (Enhanced Tracking Protection, DoH, open-source code) confirm Firefox remains the best mainstream privacy-protecting browser. Its customization, transparency, and non-profit backing still outshine Chrome, Edge, Safari, and Opera. By following the recommended settings and extensions, users can mitigate concerns raised in the articles and maintain strong privacy. For those unwilling to trust Mozilla, Brave or LibreWolf are viable alternatives, but Firefox, properly configured, remains the optimal choice for most users in 2025.

Note: Unverified X claims about USAID surveillance lack evidence and don’t impact this recommendation. Monitor Mozilla’s Privacy Notice for future changes.

#Mozilla #Firefox #Browser #Privacy #EULA #Tracking #Encryption #Telemetry #Security

QUERRY: There were recent articles about changes to firefox relating to privacy and security. please find and summarize these articles.

GROK3:

Overall Analysis

The February 2025 updates to Firefox’s TOU and Privacy Notice have stirred significant controversy due to ambiguous language suggesting broader data use rights. Mozilla’s clarifications and revisions aim to reassure users that its privacy practices haven’t fundamentally changed, but the removal of strong anti-data-selling promises and vague terms have eroded trust. Key privacy and security features remain intact, including:

• Enhanced Tracking Protection: Blocks trackers, cookies, and fingerprinting, with Strict and Custom modes for advanced users.

• DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH): Encrypts DNS requests, with logs deleted within 24 hours.

• Global Privacy Control (GPC): Replaces DNT to signal privacy preferences, though adoption is uncertain.

• OHTTP and Encryption: Protects against fingerprinting and secures data transmission.

However, users are advised to:

• Disable telemetry in Privacy & Security settings.

Use Strict Enhanced Tracking Protection, acknowledging potential site breakage.

• Enable GPC via “about:config” (privacy.globalprivacycontrol.enabled = true).

• Consider privacy-focused extensions like uBlock Origin.

While Mozilla maintains Firefox’s position as a privacy leader, the backlash highlights user sensitivity to policy changes. Alternatives like Brave or Tor are suggested for those seeking stricter privacy, but Firefox remains a strong mainstream option with proper configuration.

Note: Claims about USAID surveillance (X posts) lack credible evidence and should be disregarded unless substantiated. For the latest details, users should check Mozilla’s official Privacy Notice (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/) and adjust settings accordingly.

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

Recent articles from early 2025 highlight significant updates to Mozilla Firefox’s privacy and security policies, particularly around its Terms of Use (TOU) and Privacy Notice, which have sparked user concerns and debates. Below is a summary of key articles discussing these changes, focusing on the most relevant and recent developments:

1. Mozilla’s New Firefox Terms Spark Privacy Concerns (Medium, April 17, 2025)

Summary: This article discusses the controversy surrounding Mozilla’s updated Firefox TOU and Privacy Notice introduced in February 2025. The new terms grant Mozilla a “worldwide, royalty-free license” to use user-input data, raising fears that Mozilla might be shifting toward data monetization. The policy also allows Mozilla to modify terms without explicit user consent, with continued use implying acceptance. Users are concerned about data sharing with third-party partners, even if anonymized, and the lack of a clear opt-out mechanism. Some users are considering switching to alternatives like Brave or Chrome, though Mozilla insists it remains committed to privacy. The article suggests Mozilla may be exploring a freemium model, potentially charging for advanced privacy or AI features, which could damage its privacy-friendly reputation.

Key Points:

• First-ever legally binding TOU for Firefox, replacing informal privacy commitments.

• Vague language about data use has fueled distrust, with no clear reversal despite clarifications.

• Industry speculation about new revenue streams beyond Mozilla’s Google partnership.

_________________________________________

2. The Firefox I Loved Is Gone - How to Protect Your Privacy on It Now (ZDNET, March 4, 2025)

Summary: Written by Steven Vaughan-Nichols, this article expresses disappointment over Mozilla’s shift in privacy practices, particularly the February 2025 TOU and Privacy Notice updates. It notes the removal of the “Do Not Track” (DNT) feature, replaced by Global Privacy Control (GPC), which aims to support privacy laws like California’s CCPA and the EU’s GDPR but faces uncertain website adoption. The article criticizes Mozilla for granting itself broader control over user data, moving away from its earlier promise of never selling data. It provides practical steps to enhance privacy, such as enabling GPC, using DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH), and switching to privacy-focused search engines like DuckDuckGo.

Key Points:

• Mozilla’s new policies allow more data collection, prompting user backlash.

• GPC adoption is questionable, similar to DNT’s failure.

• Recommendations include disabling telemetry, using DoH, and exploring alternatives like Brave or Tor for maximum privacy.

_________________________________________

3. Mozilla Rewrites Firefox’s Terms of Use After User Backlash (TechCrunch, March 3, 2025)

Summary: This article details Mozilla’s response to user outrage over the February 2025 TOU, which initially suggested Mozilla could claim rights to user data. Critics highlighted a clause granting Mozilla a “nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license” to use data input into Firefox. Mozilla clarified that the terms don’t alter its data practices and aren’t driven by a desire to sell data. Following backlash, Mozilla revised the TOU to explicitly state it doesn’t claim ownership of user data and removed references to the Acceptable Use Policy to reduce confusion. The article notes that Mozilla’s removal of blanket “we don’t sell data” claims stems from evolving legal definitions of “sale” under laws like the CCPA.

Key Points:

• Revised TOU clarifies limited scope of data use, addressing misinterpretations.

• Legal definitions of “data sale” prompted cautious language changes.

• Mozilla maintains that its Privacy Notice limits data use, but trust remains strained.

_________________________________________

4. Mozilla Responds After Terms of Usage, Privacy Policy Change (The Register, March 1, 2025)

Summary: This article reports on Mozilla’s attempt to clarify the February 2025 TOU and Privacy Notice after widespread criticism. The original terms suggested Mozilla could use user data broadly, prompting accusations of betraying its privacy ethos. Mozilla’s VP of Firefox Product, Ajit Varma, issued an update stating the company doesn’t sell data in the conventional sense and revised the TOU to clarify no ownership over user data is claimed. The article notes Mozilla’s shift from claiming “we never sell your data” due to broad legal definitions of “sale.” It also mentions alternative Firefox-based browsers like Waterfox, LibreWolf, and Zen as options for privacy-conscious users.

Key Points:

• Mozilla’s initial TOU wording caused confusion, leading to a swift revision.

• The company’s privacy commitment has softened, removing strong anti-data-selling language.

• Suggests exploring Firefox forks for users seeking stricter privacy.

_________________________________________

5. An Update on Our Terms of Use (The Mozilla Blog, February 28, 2025)

Summary: Mozilla’s official blog post addresses concerns about the new TOU and Privacy Notice. It emphasizes that Mozilla doesn’t sell user data in the traditional sense and collects data only to improve Firefox’s functionality, such as optional ads or sponsored search suggestions. The post explains that the shift away from “we never sell your data” reflects broad legal definitions of “sale” under laws like the CCPA. Mozilla highlights built-in privacy features like Enhanced Tracking Protection and user-configurable settings to maintain trust.

Key Points:

• Mozilla collects anonymized or aggregated data for optional features, with privacy-preserving technologies like OHTTP.

• Users can opt out of data collection via settings.

• Legal compliance drove cautious wording, not a change in data practices.

_________________________________________

6. Mozilla Firefox Privacy Policy Update 2024: Key Changes and Security Implications (CyberSecureFox, March 10, 2025)

Summary: This article analyzes the February 2025 privacy policy updates from a security perspective, concluding that Firefox remains a privacy-focused browser despite the controversy. The updates maintain strong protections like data encryption, strict access controls, and transparent data handling. The article advises users to review privacy settings to understand control options, suggesting Mozilla’s approach balances modern privacy challenges with user trust.

Key Points:

• Policy updates adapt to digital advertising and privacy regulations without compromising core protections.

• Firefox’s security features, like tracking protection, remain robust.

• Encourages users to customize settings for optimal privacy.

_________________________________________

Additional Context from Other Sources

• Firefox Privacy Notice (Mozilla, February 27, 2025): Mozilla’s updated Privacy Notice details data collection for functionality, security, and optional features. It emphasizes user control through settings, Enhanced Tracking Protection, and features like DNS-over-HTTPS and OHTTP to combat fingerprinting.

• X Posts (April 2025): Sentiment on X reflects distrust, with users citing concerns about Mozilla’s data use for advertising or AI training and unverified claims about USAID surveillance ties. These claims lack evidence and should be treated as inconclusive.

#Mozilla #Firefox #Browser #Privacy #EULA #Tracking #Encryption #Telemetry #Security

#truth #Bible #doctrine #teaching #discipleship #Jesus #Christ

https://youtu.be/e2_Ry-zbNrk?si=U-BqECexoGUl_msJ

Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”

14 “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

15 The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”

Acts 10:13-15

HE IS RISEN ! ! !

#Jesus #Christ #Passion #Easter #Prophecy #Savior #Messiah #Jerusalem #Maranatha

THE ORIGIN

“The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally.

#Covid #Covid19 #Vaccine #Vaxx #Pandemic #Fauci #WhiteHouse #Official

http://www.covid.gov

https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/