おやすみ
Do you know what the Nostr is?
nostr:naddr1qqxnzdenxuurxv3exs6nxvfnqgsdxpfv503a2ga3ajqxw843hws9z7302ghpj4mcmjpa6qagmp9pwrsrqsqqqa288waz64
is this the correct group to request? I tried yesterday but am getting decryption errors and there and only 'Sat' is replying:
npub17a6fz2j9h8kekhsahqzjr0tg5uawh9u3p4zg0mw9jz95tfq3ujxq7a7x39
I don't want to be notified by anything or anyone 😂😂.
someone should write a cyberpunk dystopia novel about this fictional universe...oh wait we're there now. :(
nostr:note1xfqsezan97ktq3hefkgapptpk32h68m7vj7eqk94n6jj8wgvs44sg05smqoh gawd I know that movie. trailer alone gave me such anxiety
you go to sleep? ☕☕☕☕
it looks pretty cool and an interesting solution to privacy. what I'm not seeing though is how it prevents a breach if your device is compromised. since each phone is a server the data is still locally present right? or am I misunderstanding something?
love this client 🙂
are those cargo pants? 😱
I just looked this up, are you taking about keet by holepunch?
## Citrine 0.2.6
- Add support for import nostr.sync backup files
- Add support for [translations](https://crowdin.com/project/citrine)
Download it with [zap.store](https://zap.store/download), [Obtainium](https://github.com/ImranR98/Obtainium) or download it directly in the [releases page
](https://github.com/greenart7c3/Citrine/releases/tag/v0.2.6)
If you like my work consider making a [donation](https://greenart7c3.com)
I see this is running the local host so I expect it's not to be used in the same place public relays go.
Do clients have to specifically support citrine?
npub10td4yrp6cl9kmjp9x5yd7r8pm96a5j07lk5mtj2kw39qf8frpt8qm9x2wl how secure would you say it is by comparison?
what a fucking world where Facebook Messenger has better privacy than Apple messages.
the fact apple will not support e2ee in their RCS implementation is an indication of their values. a company that states their commitment to privacy but only if it supports their bottom line. 🤬
watching the apple event and hearing them talk about about 'tap to cash' and 'privacy' but all I could think about is ecash and Cashu solving this in a truly private way.
no one that I've seen is questioning her rights in criticizing the ideas of fiatjaf (loosely attributed IMO).
That's not what she did though. The point of the article was first and foremost to dox him and the secondary piece was to use the information she found to discredit nostr/nostr community. The icing was using jack's name to drive the views.
freedom of speech isn't potentially putting someone in harm's way.