> then you're asking for anarchy, which means no resource sharing and an overwhelming amount of pairwise relationship.
That doesn't seem to be the case with the current Nostr experience.
nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 here's bsky team member Paul Frazee's response to your blogpost on Bluesky, if you're curious




> then you're asking for anarchy, which means no resource sharing and an overwhelming amount of pairwise relationship.
That doesn't seem to be the case with the current Nostr experience.
A guy who puts "but we need to censor!" at the top of his list of "arguments" (which I don't have time to read) is exactly the type of guy who will systematically mix up anarchy (absence of top-down hierarchy) with chaos, and voluntary association with sum zero individualism.