The freak who sent Lionel 1 bitcorn sent it from a 19 bitcoin utxo.
Baller.
Discussion
Love me some bitcorn 🌽
Sounds like someone who stayed humble for too long 😏
Wait... Nah, Matt's UTXOs should all be the standard Whirlpool denominations 😂
Thr wholecoin donation must come from someone else 🤔
I’d say it’s slim chances Lionel takes self custody seriously? 🤣
Someone needs to help whirlpool those coins so Lionel can get some privacy
Matt said he’ll have her running coinjoin and lightning by end of year, but one step at a time.
I agree tho, the sooner the better.
You mean Lionel should just use Wasabi Wallet to coinjoin that way Lionel gets MASSIVE privacy without any help needed whatsoever: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbOAbXjzBJg
Maybr if she wants to be arrested she should use Wasabi
132 and counting!
132 what?
based on what?
"132 arrests" is a fake meme spread by Samourai to scare people out of coinjoining: https://twitter.com/Kruwed/status/1636025270330064896
Arrests
"132 arrests" is a fake meme spread by Samourai to scare people out of coinjoining: https://twitter.com/Kruwed/status/1636025270330064896
132 arrests? From people coinjoining?
No, from people who were being pursued by government agencies and had their coins traced through Wasabi coinjoins
If the implementation worked that wouldn’t happen.
Example from Wasabi 1.0 in how they were able to be traced thanks to a broken implementation:
Does whirlpool have similar issues, when used through sparrow & Samurai? Excuse my ignorance
Forever Learning
I am not aware of any such cases. An advantage of using a zerolink coinjoin implementation.
This is a lie. All Whirlpool coinjoins can be unpeeled to reveal this change, it's trivial to do because of a fatal privacy flaw called 'tx0' that merges your coins without yourself instead of coinjoining them first.
Go ahead and post any example of a Whirlpool transaction on the blockchain, I can easily unmix the change created by the new entrants:
#[7]
#[8]
I’m having trouble understanding? Are you trying to shill Wasabi, Samurai, or Chainalysis?
He doesn’t understand absolute basics about Whirlpool, he is a paid wasabi shill, mute and move on
Thanks, I’m still new to mixing, appreciate the help
Wasabi has been really pushing the adverts. It was only a year ago in the trucker protests when that team totally sold their users to chainalysis, have people forgotten already?
Wasabi cannot sell any data to chain analysis companies because Wasabi does not collect any data. By default, your IP address is masked by Tor and your wallet addresses are never linked to each other thanks to client side block filters.
The reason Finch is lying about Wasabi is because, unlike Samourai, Wasabi's coordinator code is open source, so ANYONE can run their own and outcompete the closed source monopoly Samourai tried to create out of the Bitcoin privacy industry.
Revisionist history. Paid shills covering up their dark past. Disgusting behavior.
Oh really? What data do you claim Wasabi is selling to "chainalysis" since Wasabi is designed not to collect any user data at all?
Samourai Wallet collects their user's data which they can use to sell to chainalysis companies: Samourai's wallet is designed to spy on their users the second they create or import their wallet by sending their full transaction history and future unused addresses to Samourai's server. Not even coinjoining will prevent Samourai from knowing your new addresses, even your "mixed" ones.
Wasabi does not collect this information because it is privacy software, not surveillance software like Samourai.
I am shilling Wasabi.
As you can see from the amounts and addresses I posted above, Whirlpool has a known flaw allowing you can find the leftover coins and new addresses of people who enter the Whirlpool by looking at the tx0 self spend.
Wasabi does not have this flaw. ALL your coins are made private, there is no "bad bank" or "toxic change" leftover. People who send you coins in Wasabi only ever know the address they sent to, cannot identify any of your other addresses:
#[8]
Why would I care about bad bank? It’s not like I’m spending the change? Only the mixed output after X number of mixes?
He doesn’t understand toxic change 😆 a very basic concept
If I didn't understand toxic change, then I wouldn't have been able to unpeel the toxic change from those Whirlpool transactions, would I?... 😂 As you can see, I can identify Whirlpool change every time, but you can't identify Wasabi change, want to know why?
Wasabi ELIMINATES toxic change instead of peeling it like Whirlpool does in the tx0 transaction. Whirlpool exposes its users' change in a self spend transaction, making it non private. Wasabi doesn't expose its users' change because it coinjoins your entire balance. You can read more about how Wasabi eliminates change and how Whirlpool exposes it here: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/toxic-change-wabisabi-bitcoin-coinjoin-privacy
uhh yeah that's my point... You can't spend the non private change from Whirlpool, it gets frozen and put in the bad bank. Wasabi Wallet doesn't have a "bad bank" at all since Wasabi doesn't introduce these privacy flaws created from Whirlpool tx0 transactions. Wasabi makes ALL of your coins private because EVERY spend is a coinjoin, without wasting your any of your BTC like Whirlpool does when it turns them into non private outputs that can't be spent again.
I am never using wasabi after the dumpster fire V1. So many sats wasted to have uniform utxos for literally no reason.
Can you explain the reasons?
it will happen, meanwhile the monero people continue to whine