I don't know what that means nor why it is silly to say.

Also, on the face of it, "LN directly via kraken" is self-contradictory. If it's direct, it wouldn't be "via" anybody.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Who said "silly"? I just think they should set themselves up for success rather than be unable to accept all of the ln⚡️ payments users want to send. They might not be able to properly track demand for ln⚡️ as a result.

I misunderstood one of your emoji. I don't know much about lightning. What is the tradeoff they are doing here by limiting channel capacity? Why wouldn't a channel limit by default be "all the bitcoin"? Or is there some other constraint I don't understand?