nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv

You make it sound as if things are simple.

Things aren't that simple.

Yes, people should have individual rights. But one person's individual rights should be limited by other people's rights and vice versa.

Or would you advocate for a transaction to be legal, where someone pays USD 20M to some organisation to have another person killed?

Or let's say a person is suspected (with substantial evidence) to have commited a felony, would you hold up their privacy rights, as in investigators shouldn't be allowed to search their home or read their diary?