Replying to Avatar rabble

I like the idea of revokable subkeys. You could use a shared cloud custodial login service for the subkey but keep the root offline or backed up. That way you could get easy login without giving up control.

Potentially you could inscribe controls over what a subkey could or couldn’t do. Which would be interesting.

nostr:note1n8tslzwrwqkl3msf7d6xhkjz6ll9pxfjz4v0cmdw47w3glj2tessv4qpk0

Avatar
daniele 1y ago

I also would like it, but:

nostr:nevent1qqs28ujgnnm33aqpjfklfgwe6ekccy39nha49ga03wv8280a37554tspz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7fp90d5

I'm not totally against it, but its comlexity could actually kill the protocol.

Probably the solution is a NIP-46, using a FROST to create multi-signature bunkers.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.