I do not even see the need of fighting ai bots. Whene you read someones posts and your like them, what is the difference to you if it is a bot or a human?
I think the arguments matter. Not whom is axpressing them.
Are there any NIP ideas to fight off AI bots? Just curious. nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424
nostr:note1r0k2s4ckm8w75vgdm6cmueps4wg2azsfs6p9anjuj373ekwwszushxcvp3
Discussion
I wanna follow you for long enough to see you rage when you find out that your Internet friend is just a bot put in place to hoard your time.
It does matter a lot. The difference has to do with proof-of-work and having skin in the game.
Why? Why you think someones insights are more valuable to you based on how much time they invest into nostr?
Denfitly 0 causational connection in time of using Nostr and general ability to argue and bring up logical arguments.
Real people’s insights are the only ones I value since their effort shows genuine commitment and accountability, unlike current AI, which lacks artificial general intelligence (AGI) or self-awareness. Bots spew content without intent or stakes, making them pointless to engage. Most people aren’t contrarians—they parrot popular views. Flood the system with bots, and you’ve got algorithms puppeteering the masses, amplifying conformity to a dystopian extreme.
I am not arguing, that there are no people, that give great ideas. But I use llama 3.0 via duckduckgo. And my point is, that it has valuable outputs quiet often. So therefore I would not be freightened for bots using npubs.
And to be critical has always been important. This did not really change with language models (I do not like to say intelligence, since I would not assume that any language model is intelligent.)