Do everyone a favor, go to university, study medicine or inform yourself. Your posts are not supporting any kind of critical thinking. It is just straight negating of proper science. The rest is your imagination.
Discussion
This is so interesting.
I've asked you a very simple question, and in return you're giving me all sorts of advice and saying some not very nice things.
Is it because you can't answer the question?
Exactly it is because I can not answer your question...
...no it is because your question showcase, that you lack very basic understanding. It is not made up, that for some concepts you have to learn the basics first.
Learn maby how universities proof the function of a vaccine. When you do not understand, how they do it, investigate until you understand it well. Or you think that some internet dudes are just the greatest genius humanity has seen, and know how to proof the function of a vaccine better then all universities in the world? The probability for me to win all euromillion lotterys of this year is probably still bigger, than some internet dude without any reputation having better methods for scientific proof, then all universities in the world.
Extrapolating the answer to my question from your second paragraph: maybe you believe that no one has died from the measles vaccine because the universities said so? (or: if someone had ever died from a measles vaccine, the university researchers would have found that out and announced it?)
[totally off topic but I gather your first language is German and I'm so impressed with how you're arguing in English!]
Extrapolating the answer to my question from your second paragraph: maybe you believe that no one has died from the measles vaccine because the universities said so? (or: if someone had ever died from a measles vaccine, the university researchers would have found that out and announced it?)
One of the most common logical fallacies is "appeal to authority." In all of your responses - and thank you for taking the time - that appeal to authority seems to be the primary basis for your claims.
[totally off topic but I gather your first language is German and I'm so impressed with how you're arguing in English!]
ok, so me asking why you think that no one has died from the measles vaccine showcases my lack of understanding?
That just doesn't make any sense.
[totally off topic but I gather your first language is German and I'm so impressed with how you're arguing in English!]
sorry for so many responses! they didn't seem to be posting
Why aren’t there more studies about maternal immunity transfer when breastfeeding infants? One could critically think of getting their babies screened for antibodies prior to any kind of vaccination? Why isn’t that even being considered? Why do Al of this blind… that’s what bothers me.
For example, why vaccinate against Hep B if the mother is testing hep B negative? This doesn’t seem to be making any sense as Hep B is transmitted through blood. As far as I’m concerned babies don’t play with needles. Increased immunity over the lifetime if vaccinated at birth/2 months is a weak argument in the face of vaccine risk. It makes no sense. I feel the medical community is taking all these questions way too lightly, blindly following recommendations and cashing their checks.
I see it different. But since you seem to choose your way, completely independent of informed professors and doctors, it seems impossible to help you and a waist of time.
I have not chosen my way, I’m simply asking questions that seem pretty damn relevant. In fact some countries like Finland do not mandate Hep B vaccination for babies born of Hep B negative mothers. It seems logical. You’re the one who seems to be following a doctrine blindly.
Look all I say is this. When somebody is searching for good information, one needs to find people to trust in. When I need to know how to construct a house, I go out to an engineer focused on constructing buildings. When something seems weird, I may search for another engineer, that is not related to the first one.
When anyone follows this path of critical thinking, one does not always find the super solution. But it is probably the best bet to get a good answer.
Things seem to have gotten pretty damn weird with the first engineer if you know what I mean.
Better yet read a book written by a doctor who kept track of his vaccinated vs unvaccinated kids. Someone who had a sample size of thousands and who followed all of them for decades as their primary care physician.
Then listen to that doctor after he ran the data comparing the vaccinated vs unvaccinated kids only to find that the vaccinated kids had objectively worse health outcomes in literally EVERY single category measured. These findings all being statistically significance.
The doctor who did this is named Paul Thomas. You can read his book or listen to him on many podcasts. It’s a very inconvenient fact for the brainwashed vax retards and their big pharmaceutical religion.
Look, scientific proof is nothing inconvenient. I am only intrested to know, what gives best health to our society. Your proposition is to go back in time, before vaccines were invented. When you think, that there is no existing history books, that can show you just fine, how health was before vaccines, then you understand little.
History: https://historyofvaccines.org/history/vaccine-timeline/overview?ref=nf
And your wise words are. Lets introduce all this deadly killers, that are more harmful then any worldwar until now, back into our society.
Maby do ask a laboritory, if they can give you a sample of all this deadly illnesses. You would like to show the world, that they are best treated, by not vaccinating. Maby some of your friends also make part of such a study without any vaccination. Maby you would learn, that there are illnesses, which are much more efficient in killing, then Hitler or Stalin (when you check the numbers of people killed). And this is no exageration. This is the history of humanity. I am sorry for you, if they do not teach basic history in your public schools. But then maby you should start reading history yourself.
Sure. A single doctor kept a diary (?) of thousands of children who he vaccinated and he sistematically tracked their health outcomes through their lifetimes. And now he shot a documentary about it and is streaming podcasts. Are you reading yourself?
And this doctor has no incentives to sell his book, his podcasts... Only the big pharma have economic interest.
You really think, that a person like him would trick voulnerable people only to make a fortune for himself? I mean this would be very crule. Wouldn't it?
And when his ideas would be false, he probably is responsible for houndreds, when not thousands of hospitalisations and death, that do not happen with vaccinated people.
It is kind of obvious, that it is much more probable, that universities around the globe (USA, Europe, Russia, China) follow a big conspiracy, where millions of people trick us.
We defnitly have to live in a hostile world, where only 10 people know the real solutions, they have podcasts and big youtube channels, where they despretly try to help everyone. But it seems weird, why only people of low education seem to get this. The world is sometimes complicated...
*ironieoff