Nostr Web Client

Man’s job given to Adam is to categorize and explore creation. So I think investigating the tiny particle/waves is useful and part of our work.

If most physicists are unbelievers or have rejected Christ- then we need to continue that area of work in a truthful way and for Christ’s glory.

My intention with this response is to warn/remind you about the temptation of a prideful ignorance that I am guilty of- I use it as an excuse for my own sloth.

Peace be with you in the Lord Christ Jesus.

Weatherall 2mo ago 💬 1

thanks for the kind thoughts... i thought about clarifying that of course only G_d decides who is a "christian" in a way, however, I decided against it because man is a liar and G_d knows what I mean.

As far as Adam's privilege of naming all the animals, Okay, BUT we are not talking about that here. We are talking about the fact that man is worshipping a graven image that he himself has dreamed up - that pf reductionist scientistic materialism.

Such a view led from its "anchoring" in the "Enlightenment" directly to the erroneous and exclusively materialist (atomist) model of the electron.

And when the double-slit revealed a contradiction in their THEORY, rather than re-examine first principles, they created a fantasy universe wherein man's Reductionism was vaulted squarely into idol status...

There are no "waves/particles" IN NATURE.

The fundamental "uncertainty" at the base and peak of the entire "quantum" mental masturbation mountain of dung is a weapon of the devil.

It "implies" that Truth is unknowable at worst and a matter of perspective at best... both are entirely unbiblical and anti-tradition.

The Aether is, was, will always be the solution to this popular idiocy...

finally, if its "pop" - it aint the chosen few - and it aint for the elect.

all you men need to do is go listen to Theoria Apophasis long enough to overcome your bovine defenses and you will see and be better for it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nicnym 2mo ago

I will check that out thanks 🫡

ruralrobbie 2mo ago 💬 1

I don't think your sources on quantum were accurate. The way you're describing these things is not how I was taught nor how they're used in things like computers, radios, and GPS navigation.

I say the proof is in the pudding--if it works in God's world, there is at least some element of truth. Just because the Mayans thought human sacrifice brought rain, does not mean that rain isn't needed for crops.

Example:

We're neighbors...

You live over the hill from me,

I come visit you, and then I go home.

When my head dissapears behind the crest of the hill, you know as Truth that I am still here on Earth. You know I am behind the hill. But you don't know if I stopped walking, or saw a pretty flower in the field and ran over to pick it.

If we I visit you 100 times in a year

And every time my head vanishes over the crest of the hill you toss a baseball in the EXACT same place each time over the hill

And my walking is mostly constant but kinda random

THEN at the end of the year we have a table like this:

Date | Hit?

---------|-------

10/24 | yes

11/14 | no

...

We sum up the times your ball hit me:

Say, it's 70% of the time, just for example.

The next time you go to throw the ball, your wife says "I bet you won't hit him!"

And you say "Well, there's a 70% chance I will hit him...you're betting on the wrong odds!"

If she says "Oh my, are you saying truth is relative?!" you will be a wee bit confused.

That's probability--my location isn't relative, but from your perspective BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SEE ME we as humans need to use probability to describe how we experience God's creation.

Perspective actually does change things. God's perspective is different from ours. And He knows the position of everything. But because we are not God, and are limited, we cannot know the position of everything.

Quantum theory (and similar) is a model that helps us predict what will happen when we do something.

It's not reality. It explains reality, imperfectly.

Wicked people combine that imperfect model with their anti-God religion and use that model to justify their religion. They use their religion to give the model theological and philosophical weight.

But that's like using a gun to take an innocent life. The model isn't the issue. Maybe the person who built the glock was a blue haired septum pierced lesbian--doesn't mean that I'm not going to pick it up off the floor and put it to good use. The cause is the issue, not the weapon.

There are some really faulty models out there. The Indian medical tradition for example.

But quantum physics is the model that has allowed humans to design the computer that you used to type your post.

If you want some good resources I can recommend.

Grace and peace.

Weatherall 2mo ago

bruh...