Just to clarify, I'm not hating on ecash. Ecash is great for people without trust issues. I'm not one of them. It's the same as some people enjoying anal sex, I don't. So basically it's an "each to their own" situation.

Me, I grew up in a world that was designed to be trustless and that has worked very well for me over the year. Why would I change that?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

over some is the It's for was be an me very without basically world that own" for great grew ecash. of the well enjoying year. and trust their on it's designed to issues. one I "each would to hating change I I'm that? not sex, don't. in Ecash as to So trustless that has people Why worked a them. I'm situation.

Me, anal Just up I people not same clarify,

it’s more like enjoying eating garbage

we're much alike

i use custodial wallets with small amount for convenience, being ecash based or not does not make a big difference but i like it more because you can choose mints, you also gain privacy. Other than that if if you dont use custodial wallets, there is still the cool feat that you can send LN payments over text so you can send as a text message to someone or in a http header, that is usefull imo.

Oh yeah, its nice to play around with.

I'd be completely fine with it if it was non-custodial and had a cryptographically secured unilateral exit mechanism. all the other features are very cool and fun to play with and hack on. I can see why people who are dumb enough to not care about the counterparty risk are having so much fun with it. but there's just that one giant deal breaker.....

Once you have been shafted by fiat, there's no need to be shafted with ecash.

ecash is for people who can trust (or kick the ass of) the issuer.