Right. You kind of have to optimize for one or the other medium.

Plenty of Youtube channels I watch have ~10 minute-ish overviews of some particular thing. Sabine Hossenfelder for science news, nostr:nprofile1qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddakk7um5wgh8q6twdvhsqgp3ed8nqpenntha396z26mszm2xdmx2vs4clndqfk8fs7g67kulny5q8nxj for urbanist content, etc.

They tend to flip between camera shots of themselves at a desk "waist-up", I.e. news-anchor style, and then other screen-filling content like graphics, maps, etc. This is good, and works particularly well for TV presentation. It would NOT work as a podcast.

But most video podcasts, it's just Zoom in on someone's face, where you can see the ring light reflected in their pupils. Blow that up onto a 70-inch TV and you've got a GIANT TALKING HEAD staring you in the eyes for 2 hours. No variation, just the head.

It's jarring... do people actually do that?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

if it's just someone's face that is good, it means it can still be listened to

Yes, quite a lot of them. Our biggest base on one platform is almost 70% TV watchers. I mean I suppose we aren't terrible on the eyes, but why?

you don't have stats from listeners? such platform is biased towards watchers?