really? 90% isn't even theft any more. that's plain robbery.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq7ueramk6pxc0j6agfvk3qv855s0dt7pdv4e45nd434caemv9pqdqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uqzqz7cr6e5nr3fezvakjef3pyyxjc4e4sjru8t7u75uzmhtzat0kzky2xepy

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why not 100%? They are rich, they can live without income. Fucking Communists!

Imagine taking 100% of a rich persons money... making them poor again. That would be a first. (This law will never pass and we know it)

Didn't know that!

But it’s not normally 90% of everything.

It’s normally (for example):

First 12K - no tax,

next 13K - 20% tax

next 50K - 40% tax

next 50K - 50% tax

anything above that 90% tax

Hey, you are talking about European fucking politicians so, if you can expect the most stupid things to happen, you will always be fine...

That’s what happens when you elect communists…

We don't elect people any longer in the EU. They're being placed as we've just seen with the French election results.

I know … and I think it is the same pretty much everywhere. It’s terrible.

It is that's why it makes noore sense to think national. We're all people, were all being screwed over by the Elites and NGOs big time.

They propose 90 out the gate so that 60 sounds like a compromise and not blatant theft

As notícias no Brasil são que a "extrema direita" perdeu e a esquerda venceu. Mas 90% de roubo??? Pqp! Temos que chamar de "ultra extrema esquerda"...