So basically 3/4 of all LN Bitcoiners are using custodians. Awesome...

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqdxj75n57x2clnfvkfrrm2l2mhu2y8uy4njzg8dg3qprhuzueqy4qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qpqq97uq3zvqyxlnhvq5u5l4qatc2e39nnlmsgv4u5wk2cxxp9a5dmq40xss8

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s easy af

until the sats are gone 🤷‍♂️

Oh no!!!! What will i do if my pocket change is rugged

😩😩😩

Exactly

I wouldn’t keep my life savings on there

Fácil uso. Supongo

La conveniencia por encima de la seguridad otra vez. La mayoría de la gente nunca aprenderá.

La experiencia cuesta plata perdida decía un amigo.

Pero si usas lightning para zaps en nostr y para alguna tonteria mas ,

no es necesario pagar el precio de la custodia

que significa gestionar un nodo bitcoin+lightning +el server todo el dia funcionando.

Yo lo he hecho, me cerraron canales, se cortaba la luz, el otro nodo del canal no estaba online...

Mil motivos para que mi wallet lightning no funcione

Uso minibits para los zaps y phoenix (fee altas) para minipagos , y listo...

No necesito custodiar mas que eso

No culpemos a la gente por usar lo que conviene 👍

I'm currently using several, I still use WoS for sending zaps, mainly because it just worked out like that. I've got a zeus node, a channel open via phoenix and I still have sats in my alby wallet.

Yeah, self custody vs custodial is less important for Lightning. It shouldn't be where you store your life savings anyway, so whether you get rugged shouldn't be a major hit to your financial wellbeing.

And I say that as someone who uses his own node for 99% of his Lightning transactions.