It's natural progression when questioning and discovering _all_ inverted truths.
Discussion
Natural progression is to ignore testimonials from survivors and the evidence of actual concentration camps?
Again one thing to question narratives (“discovering inverted truths”) but sorry to inform you that denying the holocaust and sympathizing with Nazis is not a natural progression of anything
Verbal and written testimonies are much easier to fabricate than physical evidence, such as modern chemical analysis of residues left on walls.
There were certainly camps but only lice bugs were gassed at them, not humans.
Ok…you got it.
Keep thinking the Nazis were the good guys in this story and they didn’t murder Jews
Best of luck living in your fantasy world.
I'm not claiming that no Jews were murdered.
I'm stating that the gas chambers story is false. It does not hold up under dispassionate investigation.
Most Jews that were murdered so far as I can tell were killed in mass reprisal massacred against partisans, percieved or otherwise.
The wermacht (and aligned civilian populations) were ruthless when dealing with partisans.
Your friend and allies in these threads are…guilty by association
Best of luck with the nazi sympathizing…sorry but not a great look
Do you think that it's possible to both criticize the "weapons of mass distruction" narrative, and point out that it was false, without automatically becoming a *Saddam Hussein sympathizer"?
False equivalency?
It's the exact same principle.
We can agree to disagree on that one. Do not think it is the exact same principle
Holocaust denial goes hand in hand with Nazi sympathizing. You believing the Nazis that they didn’t murder Jews is giving them sympathy
Meanwhile I criticize America for lying about the weapons of mass destruction but am by no means a saddam sympathizer
I do not claim to speak for them, and they do not speak for me.
I am very deliberate with my choice of words along with the arguments and positions that I take.