I don't understand this perspective. Edits are clearly shown as edits, you can always see original, and it provides a compact yet expressive way for us to acknowledge and clarify our mistakes rather than appearing not to care.

Spamming is just spam. nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 may have been the inventor or co-inventor or founder or whatever of #Nostr, but he is not immune to spamming.

I don't honestly see the issue, I follow him, I click the edited button to see his original message, I move on.

If it is the size of his posts, I'll say it again. Spam is spam.

The issue is not the usage from a user perspective; the issue is that it creates a fork, between clients that support this and clients that don’t. A client that shows edits will show an entirely different thing than a client that doesn’t.

Keeping kind 1 simple is crucial which is also why we don’t support markdown, html, and all kinds of bells and whistles.

If you increase the cost of running a node few people will.

If you increase the cost of creating a client few people will.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Welcome to the Fediverse circa 2021…

But tools like Nostr Development Kits will raise the bar from the other side.

You can’t depend on SDKs to abstract complexity; that’s the death of protocols because then the SDK becomes a choke point and developers using the SDK become captive, downstream, to the SDK.