Regarding the strength of the case made, agree to disagree. I e seen FAR stronger cases made for Hal Finney although I think neither is Satoshi. It’s a great documentary on other fronts. But to your point, my opinion is irrelevant. 🤝
Discussion
Hal's work during that time is well know, he didn't code c++, by the late Satoshi period Hal's disease had progressed greatly and there is no way he could have kept up with the workload Satoshi put in, he was known to be an early miner but his mining did not match the Patoshi Pattern. Those are all reasons we know it wasn't Hal. If you think there is a stronger case, let's hear your evidence.