Discussion
Sirrrrrrr
☀️🤙
8min openings, that's like all TikTok of the whole year
Pretty incredible. No teleprompter or notes.
Back when we actually expected our leaders to have a modicum of intelligence…and yet neither had dignity.
Ces hommes politiques ou d'autres dans d'autres domaines ( la génération des Steward Brant par exemple) n'ont rien à voir avec ceux que nous voyons depuis les années 90 à part une ou deux exceptions près . Quelle chance des fois d'avoir eu des proches qui ont participé ou vécu durant ces périodes puis qui ont su transmettre à leurs progénitures certains moments de l'histoire de notre Monde ...
Your new special interest?
Me in middle school af
Pourquoi pas, il se devrait déjà de commencer à s'impliquer en tant acteur participant de vie politique et sociale de sa ville d'origine voire les autres États plus open-mind où il a l'habitude de vivre ...Qui sait il aura toujours des *haters* compte tenu de son statut social.. cependant de par ses actions très humanistes du Monde je pense qu'il pourrait apporter sa *pierre* à l'édifice , de plus il doit bien maintenant comprendre comment fonctionnent certains dirigeants de notre époque ..Pensez-y 🍀ça peut le faire surtout dans un pays qui a quand même eu un certain *Trump* type de personnalité dite *difficile* en psychopathologie .Comment cela a été possible dans un des pays les avancés au Monde . Allez nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m c'est possible 🍀🌊je crois en votre détermination...
No hate, just chill.
🙏 je pense nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m comprend très bien qu'il a des détracteurs qu'ils appellent lui-même des *haters* lorsque ceux qui le connaissent s'inquiètent des mots que certains internautes sont capables de mettre sur son dos Mais la vie est ainsi faite on ne peut pas plaire à tout le Monde. Même en demeurant mystérieux, silencieux sur beaucoup de choses, il est sujet à une certaine haine dont il est parfaitement conscient. Je lui souhaite juste de se préserver tout demeurant lui-même 🙏
How come the guys the past have way way more brains than us now? Industrial military complex. Your taxed 30% to go and disrupt governments and kill people. How do you feel about that?
From 1960 to 1962, under the rule of the CCP, 96 million people starved to death in China, and the CCP artificially caused food shortages. 96 million people starved to death. My father was in high school at the time. In school, he saw with his own eyes that many classmates and teachers starved to death in the classroom. He also goes to school hungry. Because my grandpa was a doctor and had a way to get food to help my father survive the famine.
Tick. Tock.
well -
it was essentially a battle of modality: family man versus company man. debate it all you want retroactively but jack won.
the rhetorical devices are exactly the same, including the respectful facade; it was cutthroat behind the scenes. i know a few dicks - but other than having been treated to passive aggressive assumptions, i have nothing to do with nixon. and i'm not cia. lmfao.
I like in 1960 when Jackie spoke Spanish in an ad for her husband’s campaign.
Minions already told us… 
We’ve gone backwards in many ways. Modern public discourse doesn’t compare to the old days. This is a debate between Malcolm X and James Baldwin. Couldn’t imagine this type of decorum and intelligent in a public debate nowadays
(time set). "like nixon made very bad image on television he was far
too hot at character much better on radio or on the movies
not bad on the movies which will take quite hot characters but nixon was"
-- Marshal McLuhan
kennedy and nixon represented two modalities: kennedy promoted real social actualisation while nixon was a theoretician. nixon applied rhetoric to always antagonize the discourse without much actualisation. he was a spreader of narrative messaging, but not much of a doer. kennedy came from a belief structure which promoted doing. the family mindset often is self-built while the company mindset insists on discovery and reforming whatever antagonizes the company narrative. nixon, while an effective spreader of company narratives, was not one for actualizing policy which benefitted the citizenry. whatever your views of them personally aside, both were effective - but from different vantage points and with goals. when we elect leaders, it is imperative to know from where and to where their ideas stem/grow. of course it's also important to realize both perspectives remained active - which resulted in a great deal of social energy and misapplication of ideas because of personal disagreements arising out of policy difference.
EO 11110 is still active.
This is great! How respectfully they interact with each other, how young they are, how they don‘t weasel around (at least Kennedy).