this is the way for 1-to-many writes.

now consider the inverse for reads: connect to 1 relay that fans in many relays. 1 websocket connection to the phone, dedupe happens on the server. I just need nip-42 to prevent crawlers from ddosing my fan in relay nostr:note1hagrnf4jzk37hhdtca5ysz4qjm2qt08tx78ypcx6dc0g3c0tcfas8e08t4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, it's called multiplextr: https://github.com/coracle-social/multiplextr

nice! I built one too because I am a javascript disrespector 😝

but I need nip-42 auth because I want to whitelist users.

Agreed, javascript is bad and AUTH is critical. Let's go!

I understand the situation.

1. Realistically it's a good solution.

2. If the problem is bandwidth, ideally, Negentropy or any syncing protocol is a more elegant solution. Weaken the client, the edge, weaken the decentralization.

@nostr:npub1yxprsscnjw2e6myxz73mmzvnqw5kvzd5ffjya9ecjypc5l0gvgksh8qud4

I would imagine negentropy on a client would create too much latency for on-demand content. But it's definitely important for powering proxies/dvms

I think it depends on perspective/use-case. I love the decentralized network of relays. I just want to connect to it from a single point, in the cloud, on a server I control. this has a few benefits for me:

- not doxing my ip, no vpn

- less bandwidth

- very fast

- better for offline/offgrid clients

- can even be interacted with over an ssh tunnel

Good point. I did not consider these use cases.