Verifying how many coins have been mined is not the same as auditing how many coins exist.

And the code base being open sourced means that anyone can fork the code and run their own malicious copy of it with no way to determine the effect on the network, because the network can't be audited...

Don't think I'm attacking monero, the more privacy tools the better. But it's most certainly got its flaws.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You audit the exact same way a Bitcoiner audits Bitcoin. You run a node. No substantive difference. No Bitcoiner is taking advantage of Bitcoin's transparency to verify the hundreds of millions of transactions inside 800,000+ blocks themselves. They're just relying on their node to do that for them.

No clue what point you're trying to make with that second paragraph. Makes no sense. Bitcoin is also open source and forkable.

Just because Monero uses more complex cryptography and math to verify (pederesen commitments and range proofs) doesn't mean you can arbitrarily and trivially trick anyone with a malicious copy. Any fake amounts would be invalidated.

I'm not attacking you either I'm just trying to understand what you mean by these things. I agree, everything has flaws.