Communism is the second oldest mistake in the book. It is the religion of envy and the reason communists will never be bitcoiners.
They will either learn the error of their ways and give up their communist fantasies or they will eventually try to kill you for your bitcoin. There is no other option.
The story of Cain and Abel will always be relevant.
They’ll never give up communism because it’s the only way they can attain what they desire
Eva sure is making a stink on the blue check-mark bird app. 🤷♂️
I had never heard of her until this recent thread. But she is an archetype that some bitcoiners claim it is important to appeal to.
Bitcoin is incompatible with their way of thinking and they will either have to change or they will reject bitcoin.
Same, and she is throwing a lot of incongruent points into one giant basket of gripe.
There’s some validity to her frustrations, but not to her overall argument.
I think she’s churning a lot of engagement because it skirts that fine line of indignant outrage with just enough moral justification that we know the twatter algo just eats up with a fork and spoon.
Every Bitcoiner that takes their seed to the grave with them increases the value of your corn by making it relatively more scarce. Killing Bitcoiners makes the surviving ones richer.
Commies in shambles when they realise their preferred methods will work against them.
Uh, so wait lemme get this straight. You don't want communism, so I assume you're pro capitalism, but then why not worship the dollars instead of the Bitcoin? Cause as the math in your post States, it doesn't matter which currency you worship.
You can spend half your life building/marketing something that nobody believes in, and if it becomes worth something then whichever whale notices you first will sweep in and take it.
That's the way of capitalism. Born in lower tier pyramid, die in lower tier pyramid.
No escape
Bitcoin is nothing to be worshipped, it is just a tool for protecting your savings from those who want to take it without earning it.
Anyone capable of earning more than they spend is capable of escaping poverty. I’ve escaped poverty myself so I don’t pay much attention to morons and losers who claim it is impossible.
Interesting. So have I in the past, but facing the challenge once more later in life is just as interesting but with a lot more outdated facts.
What was your method?
Eva is making a classic reductionist fallacy.
