Why tho? There are much better ways to store data.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why not?

It's very inefficient. It's a terrible database for arbitrary data storage. It's wildly expensive and would take decades to do it probably. Not sure if it's even possible because we make more data every day. Then it's terrible to query against.

All we have is time so the sooner we start the better…

Flood it with porno

A great use for the block space 🙄

Block size does matter!

#haiku

Yes!

Lol

Porn is what drives digital development.

Am I wrong?

Ascii boobs for all

Oh fuck... You're gunna make me ...

Do another OP_RETURN

Tells you how far BTC has diverged from the original thesis of uncapped block sizes.

2017 broke Bitcoin and it shows

I don't even think it's possible to store all the data on Bitcoin.

Whoever wants to is throwing money away.

Not at the existing build. BTC is shackled on purpose so that you use side chains and third party networks. Hal Finney suggest the 1mb cap but Satoshi didn't want it. He only added that because in the early days someone with more compute could steal the network from them, so they capped it.

Always meant to be unbounded, and you'd pay for that data to the miners, thus fees would naturally take over price prediction.

But here we are today, 7tps every ten mins with fewer transactions per block each week.

I don't see a sustainable path forward here tbh

I do. We're still early