ZAP⚡ or BOOST 🔄

to support the content that you want to see?

you can do both but it does pose an interesting question on what is more valuable for the note creator in the long run.

Boosting* is more important and supportive to the creator because it increases the reach of the note and more people can see it. There is one algorithm that runs nostr and that is time.

When you boost a note 2 hours** after it's been posted, you extend the life of that post another 2 hours and spread it to people who follow you. Boosting increases viralty which can't be bought with zaps. (I think some sites/apps do have a TOP notes which pick out the top zapped posts over a period of time, but it isn't the common way that people browse notes)

When it comes down to how someone interacts with my notes, I'd much rather get boosted then zapped. I very much appreciate every zap I get, don't get me wrong. Coins in my pocket is positive reinforcement to do more of whatever I just did. It is a strong signal.

It does seem counterintuitive to repost a note because it's like "well, I saw it and so many people saw it also and boosted it already. what's the point if I post it myself?" the point is twofold. one, I already mentioned, it makes it accessible to more people and prolongs the note. two, it shows real endorsement and support.

There is no real delete on nostr. The notes you write, the posts you boost (and your typos) are associated with your npub. Your npub is you as a person, digitally. If I see an npub of someone I trust boosting a post of someone else, that is a type of endorsement that can't be bought with zaps.

*boosting is also known in other apps as reposting. when you boost/repost, you're posting the note on your feed.

**2 hrs is an arbitrary number. I don't know the typical lifespan of a nostr note.

nostr:nevent1qqswljn5c4fluc84dhwq60tw33lcyunck03epz2rpcrnx3yc58ve2nqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyruwd3jrgtc7q5jgqccwylsszmwwxh7r5c2wvpp5lm625fgrx2x2jqcyqqqqqqgs6a5se

nostr:nevent1qqspyd678vw8crgpa74zmvc4nt8sw96wlmmp4s3jnau8zcn4ddatf9cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyphydppzm7m554ecwq4gsgaek2qk32atse2l4t9ks57dpms4mmhfxqcyqqqqqqg8kgn5m

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hint: It's possible to do both. No one ever paid their bills with exposure.

it literally is the second sentence that I wrote 😅

Yes it is, but that was an afterthought and your overall point is that boosting is better. I disagree. Zapping is better. Boosting is second. Especially for the creator who is truly trying to pay the bills. One hundred boosts have the same monetary value as zero boosts. It is only zaps that truly sends value back to the person from whom you received value.

Of course getting zapped is good for the short term. It is immediate value to the creator. I'm not arguing against that

a creator who is looking for pay the bills should focus on creating content that is valuable enough to get paid right now AND to get endorsed so that it reaches even more people that will pay them in the long term.

one hundred boosts doesn't have the same monetary value of zero boosts. when the visibility of a post expands to more people, the potential of it getting zapped increases. there's no guarantee, but it is some amount greater than if the post was not boosted at all. boosting doesn't exist in a vacuum where zapping doesnt occur.

we're on the same page here and I appreciate your insights.

My two sats, I repost for my community to see. It is not an endorsement. I do it for exposure it's value is in the air.

Zap me and you have my attention

We're not on the same page. Lol. Please don't attempt to change what I'm saying. I disagree with you about the value of boosts. They are not completely lacking in value as they increase visibility, but they are inferior to zaps. And no, they do not have monetary value, despite the fact that may increase visibility of a post, although that's not always necessarily the case (some clients hide boosts). We disagree, and that's ok. But we are not on the same page.