Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Matt Corallo

Let’s be clear, if no one steps up and decides to run LSPs because everyone is worried about regulatory concerns, every bitcoin L2 system is toast - every one that has a reasonable security model relies on some kind of centralized or federated party that has similar concerns, even if they can’t seize funds.

Without any L2 systems everyone using bitcoin will simply use custodial platforms because that’s the only way to get reasonable fees and payment latency.

And don’t go yelling at ACINQ for deciding not to operate Phoenix in the US, the software required to run an LSP is open source, with only relatively minimal liquidity allocation logic required to get started. We need new entrants, and that means new companies who think the risk is manageable (I’m confident it is, but I can’t fault anyone for not wanting to take that risk).

If you see someone suggesting ACINQ should just keep running, the correct response is “well why aren’t you running an LSP”.

Avatar
Toshi 1y ago

Are you running an LSP?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Matt Corallo 1y ago

Nope, I don’t personally want to take the risk, even if I think it’s not a huge risk.

Thread collapsed
19
334 1y ago

Matt and devs like him are too valuable to bitcoin (and humanity that depends upon it) to place at risk of encumbrance and persecution by unjust laws.

Thread collapsed