Wow, that’s a lot. Must be a new channel creation type thing or something? I’m not 100% sure about the cashu protocol and how it all interfaces with lightning.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm assuming it's the new channel creation but it still seems high for a base chain fee

I thought cashu relies on the mints lightning channels

im still learning and don't have a response

Me too, I want to run my own mint

That is really high! Weird. What mint is it?

minibits

That’s one of the ones I use too.

Yeah this sounds like a lightning node issue. Did you not have an existing lightning wallet?

Just FYI receiving small transactions to a new node with no channels is an expensive proposition. Your service provider probably has a minimum channel size and you are being charged for extra inbound liquidity.

Best practice is to fund a new lightning wallet with a large on-chain transaction. Then spend your balance down naturally or swap it out with a submarine swap. That way you have a large channel balance ready ahead of time with inbound liquidity. This lets you avoid paying high time preference fees.

Worst practice is to start with a small channel and have to increase the size of your channel each time you receive a payment. It sounds like you might be doing the latter. You might as well use Muun b/c you are transacting on chain for each LN payment. 😬

I've gone down the road far enough to know that I don't want to manage lightning channels

haha samesies