Replying to Avatar PABLOF7z

Topical relays 👇

nostr:note1jkkdwtlgf2cthuhd6c7qdptyqaxv9m80qteq7gx47t4qws65u9rq6thn3w

What if nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c could write his thoughts on this conflict on a relay that is dedicated to these themes, and instead of having to attempt to compartmentalize in this way, the conversation would naturally trend towards such relay.

Not interested in it? Don't connect to the relay.

Ofc, all clients fall short of making this UX possible. But the protocol allows it and we should build software that enables it.

What do you think of adding an optional "relays" tag to kind 1 notes such that other relays can refuse these notes?

"oh, this note was intended to only these other relays, so I won't bother storing them"

These would probably also fix the problem of the Japanese chatter that happens in some relays in a constant stream of responses without any tags and gets propagated to other relays totally out of context.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't like it. It sounds too much like hearding the #Jews into the gas chambers..💀🫤

It would also sort of stop blastr.

I like this as a forcing function to Balkanize relays

It does make me want more to have pubkeys for relays instead of URLs