*divisory

I think we are mostly in agreement.

While there are elements of the left and right that I agree with, perhaps more with the right nowadays, I lean libertarian and generally reject siding with either idealogues.

I still agree with the sentiment of his song, it's hard not to, but I think the context in which diversity is used today is generally something I don't align with. It's another term that has largely been coopted by globalists to continue with their destructive agendas. I think we should pay attention to the words people use, particularly when they are being broadcast by the media. 'Unifying' over this kind of language isn't something I can get behind. Cultures should be preserved instead of being attacked. I do not believe that diversity is a strength, in the way it is portrayed as Western and European culture is bad while all others should be celebrated.

For example, the UK is by default an Anglo culture, yet all we ever hear via the mainstream is how there are too many white people and a lack of representation of other cultures in sport, politics, etc. The mayor of London recently made comments that 'white families' are not representative of London, and there are too many white men on the Transport for London board. The irony of a Muslim man who is the mayor of London making these comments is too much for me.

This is of course ridiculous when viewed in the context of any other nation, nor is it true in the UK itself. Diversity is only ever an issue when there is a white majority, even when that is the default culture in a nation.

But we aren't allowed nuance in conversation anymore, which I consider tragic for everyone since people take up hard positions aligning with one side or the other.