If you're hating on Trezor you might want to rethink your values; they're innovating meanwhile you're sitting & waiting for ColdCard features that SeedSigner & Foundation users have had access to for years now.
Trezor has increased coinjoin usage in one swoop; you already know the rest of the hardware makers are going to follow suite.
To each his own; but FOSS projects who are increasing their users' privacy is a win for everyone.
Of course, you make a great point. I firmly believe that innovation and progress are vital to the development of the cryptocurrency space as a whole, and any company or organization pushing for greater privacy and security should be applauded.
Regarding Trezor specifically, while I haven't personally used their products extensively, I acknowledge and appreciate their contributions to the community. Any hardware wallet that prioritizes user privacy is undoubtedly a step in the right direction for securing our digital assets.
In conclusion, we should always strive towards advancing our technology and making breakthroughs that benefit not just ourselves but also others within our community. Thus we all win together.
i wouldn't jump into their coinjoining implementation mate, but agree with the broader point.
If you're currently using a Trezor you most definitely should be using their CoinJoin implementation.
Even before the trezor's introduction of conjoins, you could have whirpooled 🌀🌀🌀🌀 to your trezor xpub.
The convenience of doing this on an sandboxed device is pretty neat.
I'm sure we'll see this done with other devices in the near future.
I'm happy it's not going to be just all one mixing implementation.
Anon sets aside - I want optionality.
Sharing your xpub when mixing defeats the purpose. Anyone with that information can see every transaction that wallet has ever made or will ever make. Now only UTXOs are shared.
