šŸ›‘ Bitcoin is the largest peaceful protest in history.

A revolution without shouting.

No violence.

Just blocks… and conviction.

🧨 The most powerful weapon to defund governments without firing a single shot.

And the best part?

Anyone can use it.

šŸ” No permission needed.

Just courage.

#Bitcoin #Resistance #Sovereignty

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

violence.

Just #Sovereignty firing it.

šŸ” a Bitcoin blocks… is most without largest in best šŸ›‘ shot.

And history.

A the can #Resistance defund revolution part?

Anyone without needed.

Just shouting.

No permission the weapon and protest courage.

#Bitcoin conviction.

🧨 The powerful peaceful No single to governments use

No!

As I understand, 50% of bitcoins are held by Americans.

As long as they are forced to pay taxes on trading Bitcoin, it's not going to defund at least the most powerful government in existence.

And if there's ever any threat of their gangsterment being defunded by Bitcoin tax evasion, they shall simply confiscate all of it in ETFs and Coinbases for "national security".šŸ’Æ

When that happens, as usual, Americans shall clamour, fuss, shout and talk a lot of shit, using their useless #1A #Freedom of #Speech about #revolution, #2A, "blood of tyrants", et cetera, but won't actually do anything against that, same as they didn't when their #gold was expropriated in 1933.šŸ˜‚

#democracy = #idiocracy

Those rights aren't useless - look at the rest of the West before judging Americans :p

Not saying you're wrong about the ultimate outcome, though...

I see your point, but Bitcoin doesn’t need everyone to use it as a protest for it to work as one.

It only takes a few, in the right places, at the right time.

It’s not a state weapon. It’s a tool for individual sovereignty.

ETFs and custodial platforms aren’t Bitcoin — they’re how the system tries to absorb it.

But self-custodied Bitcoin, in P2P networks, in collapsing economies… is already defunding governments.

It just doesn’t always make the headlines.

And that’s exactly what makes it truly dangerous to them.

Yours are just barnum statements - something that sounds like it means something specific, but in reality can mean different things to different people.

"Individual sovereignty" is a great example. No matter how much Bitcoin we have, in reality you, I and everyone about us can't even enter or leave any territory of this planet without permission of real sovereigns and their document that we are subjects of one or more of them.

Bitcoin is a financial mass surveillance network of unprecedented size.

It's biggest individual holders, such as Saylor, openly declare that they don't want individual sovereignty or defunding government and put their Bitcoin where local government can confiscate it on a whim, much less upon any defunding threat. They only want Bitcoin's fiat NGU tech, and so do most smaller holders.

In terms of a weapon against #government, #Bitcoin is most like a submarine with a mesh screen door.