That's all? No primary source of the scientific paper/graph you mentioned? No comment about William Happer being paid by fossil intustry thinktank/lobby or that he isn't even scientist about climate or bioanthropology and just about "atomic science" ?

I really appreciate to have conversation with you about this, because it is important to be open and talk and I do respect you and your opinion!

For me it's just really hard to understand how you can complain about "mainstream science" or "mainstream media" but put poor effort on the reliability of the other shown "research" or opinion of people like William happer!

Does it just suit your feeling and opinion and that's why he is more reliable?

Again, I agree with you that nowadays you get the feeling that people from government and other elite is telling bullshit to force some political/financial direction. But it's a big difference and important to be critical to both sides! Even to bitcoin! It's important to reflect yourself and proof your evidence! Of course we both hope and think about a better future under bitcoin! But to be honest! We don't know for sure this will happen at the end!

I am open to continue this anytime! :)