Nostr Web Client

It is you who has been tricked, fren.

That's all? No primary source of the scientific paper/graph you mentioned? No comment about William Happer being paid by fossil intustry thinktank/lobby or that he isn't even scientist about climate or bioanthropology and just about "atomic science" ?

I really appreciate to have conversation with you about this, because it is important to be open and talk and I do respect you and your opinion!

For me it's just really hard to understand how you can complain about "mainstream science" or "mainstream media" but put poor effort on the reliability of the other shown "research" or opinion of people like William happer!

Does it just suit your feeling and opinion and that's why he is more reliable?

Again, I agree with you that nowadays you get the feeling that people from government and other elite is telling bullshit to force some political/financial direction. But it's a big difference and important to be critical to both sides! Even to bitcoin! It's important to reflect yourself and proof your evidence! Of course we both hope and think about a better future under bitcoin! But to be honest! We don't know for sure this will happen at the end!

I am open to continue this anytime! :)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

BTC_P2P 2y ago

Oh an article published in nature isn’t enough for you 😂

You can easily find the source material. It’s the largest most high-res ice core data ever conducted 😂

It’s sad how denial clouds your ability to think properly.

Dr3sNoir 2y ago

Dude, stop fooling around!

You have no idea about this researchers, you just catch up some pieces which suit your opinion/feeling but aren't a fact! You don't act like you have any deeper understanding of the topic!

I read the article belonging to your shown figur! the whole abstract, the results and the conclusion of this scientific work does not at all conclude that CO2 have no effect on climate. Show me where it is mentioned! 😏

The author make some conclusions and explained himself to keep caution in interpretation of the results! 👍😉

You have indeed no idea what this paper was actually all about! This paper is about tracer experiments an the interpretation of the shown results of two ice cores from Greenland! It doesn't even say that CO2 has no influence on climate! 😅

Beside this, So you think these two ice cores are the true evidence and all the other 10000 scientific works about climate change are conspiracies/propaganda?

I give you that, you are a strong believer!

You should know it better #donttrustveriy. That's how scientific work is working! You never wrote a scientific paper. You never had to defense or puplic a scientific paper in front of other scientist and discuss your results!

You acting like Shitcoinery telling and selling nonsense!

BTC_P2P 2y ago

On William Happer: he is exceptionally qualified to talk about co2. It is a topic directly tied to his field of expertise.

You think the majority of scientists who mindlessly go along with the “co2 scary” fiction don’t have major conflict of interest? Their jobs, livelihood and families literally depend on it.

If you strip away your biases toward Happer and listen to the content and hard scientific realities of the things he demonstrates you wouldn’t be able to just dismiss what he says.

BTC_P2P 2y ago

There have at least 15 warming periods in the Holocene with greater amplitude (higher absolute temps in the atmosphere) and at least 15 warming periods with greater rate of change (got warmer faster). No human contribution to co2 or elevated levels at all.

This is fact shown by reliable ice core science. If you refuse to accept the science, that’s on you, but the data is the data. Be well.

jon r 2y ago

Your doing Gods work here. I appreciate it.

BTC_P2P 2y ago

You can lead a horse to water...

Crazy to see how credible information literally can’t be internalized by this guy bc he is so hopelessly brainwashed.

I presented the facts. No way I can make anyone accept them.

You get it though. Be well fren.