Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar nout

This is interesting conversation to watch from the sidelines. We see bitcoin services that only prioritize user experience being attacked by stupid regulations, like Travel Rule, or kicked out of specific countries (WoS...).

Primal's architecture is prone to similar attacks. More so compared to "smart client, dumb server" architecture like what Amethyst does.

When the service becomes too big (like Coinbase), it will be kneeled on by all governments around the planet.

If Primal gets big, the same will happen.

What will Primal do then?

nostr:nevent1qqs0akvff0c838t6jcvnqm33yg3s60jl607zhq5an5nsx6r8ltxlpvgpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0qgsdv8emcke7k3qqaldwv956tstu40ejg663gdsaayuuujs6pknw7jsrqsqqqqqp92zf25

Avatar
TheGrinder 1y ago

By that time Miljan will have sold Primal.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
nout 1y ago

Yeah, that's a very possible scenario. The result of that would like be bad for freedom. Freedom go down. And that's where the complaints against Primal come from.

With the current architecture Primal is imo way more investable by VCs. For better or worse.

Thread collapsed