Replying to Avatar StephanGuy

i was rather disturbed about nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240's idea for blocking on nostr, the idea that all clients would collectively censor users out of some supposed 'code of honor' is just disgusting, a typical woke perversion of words too

I don’t think we’re going to agree, but yes, I would like relays to not serve content to users who have been muted by the creator. I don’t think we’re going to get relay developers to adopt that, but I’d like it to be an option and for relays to state whether or not they do it. That way you could choose to put your content on relays that would server your content to people you muted, and I could choose to use different relays.

This isn’t my highest priority but it’d be nice to have. I think censorship is taking content off the internet. What I’m saying is that I’d like to be able to kick out to my house the drunk asshole who’s shitting on my living room carpet. :-D

He can be drunk and shit in his own living room all he wants.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thankyou for your long and detailed response!

We are not going to agree

Your analogy is completely wrong

What you are saying is you are an author you publish books, your books are sold everywhere, also in libraries, and people have your books, infact some millions of copies may have been sold

You want anyone with a copy of your books not to give a copy of your books to anyone you dont desire, and that list of people may change at any moment based on your desires

I would posit also you would probably like any copy of your books destroyed should you also desire

Now might you be a god i dont see a problem with that position but otherwise its fundamentally deluded

Thats enough channeling Jordan Peterson for me lol