Then we should have a nostr based DNS π much better than Twitter Blue
Discussion
I think it was saylor who proposed bitcoin deposits for an orange badge and if you misbehave you lose it.
I kind like this idea. Just need to work out the technical details.
Maybe combine it with some other form of verification. And make the cost not trivial.
Pay $50 worth of sats and must be oked by 3 verified people. Or 10 unverified + payment. Just an idea ..
imo verification canβt be achieved. A better model is NIP-05 for early sharing identifiers, combined with web of trust via who follows whom. True verification is trusting a centralized service that has checked someoneβs state issued ID.
Easily sharing*
Aggregated trustworthiness is something I am super curious about. Could anyone point me towards info on how this could be tackled? I found some theoretical papers but not that much on implementations.
There was a verified human initiative but they verified me as a cat⦠not sure if I can trust that.
π€£π€£π€£ they get to decide, not you
Yah but I could have been a long term scammerβ¦
You could still very well beβ¦ π€ is this « look this is my faceΒ Β» act just part of the long con
Exactly. You never know, I could be the bad guy.
When there is in writing that we shouldnβt but at best learn?!
Iβm afraid arguing she was dressed slutty to rape in the shower is weak excuse when not supposed to be in the shower, no?!
Guess the corrupt and stereotyping see that as a time to go rape and piling.
Building the traps.
Us non dev plebs are fucked⦠Assessing trustworthiness is a bitch. Offline, online. The only way I know how to deal with it is to pretend to be stupid and naive and see if ppl try to take advantage of it.
β¦ problem is, I am often truly stupid and naive.
Anyone of prominence who cares about this should have their own domain one would think.
I do not disagree. We can make it easier for sure, but people need to learn to take domain names seriously π€·ββοΈ
I knew it!
More in the way of looking at interaction between users, diversity of network, frequency, duration of formed links (especially this last one). Easier said than done⦠would probably be easier to apply in a commercial context.
Trust is a link maintained over time. There must be ways of looking at this that could provide meaningful insight.
(I got attracted by the concept of decentralized academic accreditation. It would mostly rely on multiple streams of human feedback, assessing the trustworthiness of the human giving the feedback is key and rather problematic)
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3731/3132
This one was intriguing, on models for aggregated trustworthiness.
Yeah it seems better suited to centralized systems
Like a WoT solution ?
Who makes me lose it? π€ but I like the idea, essentially we can pay for other peoples verification as well , which sounds much more genuine
Something has to be done on the game theory side of things for Nostr. When people risk to lose something or not gain something they act differently. How to keep everyone on best behavior?
Sounds like a hierarchical kinda faggy let me know what you like in yer butt kinda thang.
No one tells me how to behave.
Misbehave meaning scams..
It's time everyone grows up then. Safety for the misinformed always leads to less freedom for the real people.
Really? Then what does all scams mean but social rapist?
Thatβs just proof of payment tho
Why are you attempting to nerf the only thing that can save you? Sus.