A rule of thumb when designing nostrian economics, which I'd call "desirables vs undesirables".

When user action is desirable, user should be able to get sats for it.

If the action is undesirable, user should be paying sats for it.

For example spamming a lot of people with the same comment including link? Should cost sats when you do it too much, maybe even with "exponentially" increasing cost.

Posting great, high quality post that helps a lot of folks? That should be easy to zap sats to, etc.

Who decides what's desirable and what not? In practice all actors in the network can use this rule of thumb from their PoV. Client devs can implement this, users can zap or not zap, relays can forward or not forward... In a sense this is a flavor of #value4value scaled to a full social network.

@npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s,

@npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z, @npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6, @npub18lzls4f6h46n43revlzvg6x06z8geww7uudhncfdttdtypduqnfsagugm3, @npub13ql75nq8rldygpkjke47y893akh5tglqtqzs6cspancaxktthsusvfqcg7, wdyt? Is this rule of thumb any helpful? 🔥🔥🔥