"...the launch for them to raise funds and grow even more." ... which AFAIK is why nostr: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 left to fund the creation of Nostr...

I think it remains to be seen whether the same external commercial and political forces that tore apart Twitter won't do the same thing to Bluesky.

If I could hazard a guess the comparison between Nostr and Bluesky will wind up being a bit like Bitcoin vs Ethereum. Similarly, there will come a moment, just as happened with "The DAO" in 2016, when the "Bluesky CEO" will be forced to make some tough choices about censorship and what to allow on the network (or, let's be clear, the "reference client" because this is still technically open source).

Vitalik Buterin said "code is Law" until there were $millions lost from bad code. Then he said "you know what, maybe Law is Law", and reversed it.

Will Jay Graber make the same choice?