I treasure the texts claiming to contain Jesus' words. However, the Gospels are anonymous, and Jesus didn't write anything or instruct us to read texts. He sent the Holy Spirit to teach us and recall his words (John 14:26).

I repeat, all four canonical Gospels are anonymous and it’s only through church tradition that they’re ‘believed’ to have been authored by their named title.

This isn’t gnosis, it’s in the Orthodoxy commentary, you just have to read past the first few paragraphs at times.

The first NT was by Marcion (that is unattested) and included one Gospel (Evangelion / Gospel of the Lord) and the Apostolikon (The 10 Pauline Epistles), some scholars (such as Dr Markus Vinzent & Dr Mark G. Bilby) right now are scientifically proving that this predated the latter canonised Luke (and was not a redaction).

Some thing that I only shared the other day was the "Evidence that Evangelion pre-dates Luke; the Capernaum Conundrum"

In Luke 4:23, Jesus references deeds done in Capernaum before his narrative visit there (Luke 4:31), creating an anachronism absent in Mark and Matthew, where Capernaum precedes Nazareth.

This disruption, not found in the reconstructed Evangelion (Marcion’s Gospel), suggests Luke expanded an earlier gospel, with the Capernaum reference revealing a redactional seam.

This is one of many examples that supports John Knox’s view of Luke as a later, expanded text.