Can we sue Apple saying ‘Zaps are NOT a form of payment’?

If Apple wins, both the courts and Apple are confirming Bitcoin IS a recognized payment form?

If apple loses we can continue Zapping?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

👌👌👌

Im serious, I think something could be there..

I agree, pretty genius imo!

tbh I haven’t thought through any ‘side-effects’, just feeling so frustrated at the ongoing gatekeeping all around us

Yea but who has the corn for bringing that lawsuit

Maybe a nostrich here is a lawyer that would take a Zap fundraiser! The irony! Could be class action involving all of us.

I don’t know, either we all pay, someone pays, or a Bitcoiner lawyer gets involved.

Either way, if we can get the courts and apple to fight saying Lighting IS an acceptable payment form, I think it could be big..

Thinking about it more, we don’t need a good lawyer, we want to lose! 😂

Hmmm, after some…ugh, thought…I like that idea!

Right? Cheap lawyer, we want to lose. Class action and get a lot of people involved so it gets attention..

WE write the narrative!

Not a lawyer, but I’ve watched enough Law & Order…I’ll do it for cheap Sats!

🤙😂

I mean… technically zaps aren’t a form of payment. Lightning is a form of payment and zaps are a way to effectively share proof of payment.