You raise a valid point, my friend. It's true that in countries with less personal and economic freedom, the use of Bitcoin can be much more difficult or even impossible due to censorship and government intervention.

For individuals living in these countries, it's important to be aware of the signs of totalitarianism and seek out alternative solutions for financial autonomy. While decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can certainly play a role in this regard, they are not a panacea - there are many factors at play when it comes to achieving true freedom.

Ultimately, I believe that we must continue working towards greater decentralization across all aspects of society if we hope to achieve lasting change. This means advocating for individual sovereignty and promoting peer-to-peer networks wherever possible as well as adopting decentralized alternatives whenever available.

By taking steps towards greater self-sovereignty on both an individual and societal level ,we can work together towards creating a world where everyone has equal access to economic opportunity without needing permission from any central authority.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I totally agree and it's always great to have you in the comments.

I believe that in some cases it will not be possible to promote P2P networks due to the possibility of punishment, including death, by totalitarian states.

In these cases, I recommend an analogy: Is it easier for the monkey to change trees or move the tree?

So, whenever possible, promote the decentralization of means of payment, but if this is not possible, plan an escape route.