One of the coolest emergent properties of a Wikipedia on nostr,like the new Wikifreedia.xyz client, is the fact that people don’t have to agree on what’s the truth and pretend that a neutral point of view is humanly possible.
It’s not “truth by democracy/power/influence”
It’s a savage pursuit of truth at the edges of the network.
It’s the embodiment of “embrace the chaos”
Doesn't this then have the potential of furthering our society's division?
Please Login to reply.
Quite the opposite: More speech is better than forceful indoctrination.
We as a society already disagree, but now at least dissident ideas can enjoy a similar platform, and be evaluated on their merits rather than simply being suppressed.
