One of the coolest emergent properties of a Wikipedia on nostr,like the new Wikifreedia.xyz client, is the fact that people don’t have to agree on what’s the truth and pretend that a neutral point of view is humanly possible.
It’s not “truth by democracy/power/influence”
It’s a savage pursuit of truth at the edges of the network.
It’s the embodiment of “embrace the chaos” 
Opposing injustice does not imply chaos, it can proceed in an orderly fashion.
my idea was a super bookmark where everyone uploads their own bookmarks, is it possible?
An interesting perspective on what is truth. Maybe it’s really just a point of view. Something may be true to a person because someone they trust or in a position of power told them it is true. Or they could witness something and from their own perspective believe what they witnessed is true. But upon further examination of a truth, a persons idea of what is true can change, or the truth from another persons point of view can be different upon witnessing the same event.
this is insanely good, wow, don't underestimate it. nostr:note1u6zgd23pljsfjvjv5jgx9ne4j4gcztr4quf7uudlaw7usdzzj8eqcw6drn
I’ll be talking about this on Sunday night to close out the open source stage 🧡😊
Lucky you, I didn’t get a spot to do my keynote for Bitcoin Atlantis 😔
This is quite a profound statement, touching on the infinite nature and creativity of the human psyche which you appear to have captured in the nostr protocol.
Doesn't this then have the potential of furthering our society's division?
The thing about freedom tech is I don't really get to complain, freedom is for EVERYONE, but...
...lmao
