As stated in the SAIF interview with Qawwam magazine, we welcome criticism. We do not appreciate lecturing. People seem to miss the entire point of SAIF time and time again, and project that onto us. I've explained in my reply the one sentence vision for SAIF. Everything is downstream from that, and any means to inch forwards towards that, we will take. The post misunderstands SAIF, then the author believes he can delineate between who is SAIF and who is not, which articles are SAIF (his) and which articles are too abstract to be understood. What gives?
Anyway, this is all so boring. We're not an OPSEC educational nonprofit. Some of us like to talk about that stuff because we enjoy it, think it's useful to the project, important information for people to have access to or a mixture. Others don't at all. Getting lost in the toolbox and missing the shed that needs to be built.