The one significant positive of the fee spike, despite it being caused by excessive garbage not even related to Bitcoin’s value, is that it makes every exchange which hasn’t integrated #Lightning look reeeeaaaalllly stupid.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hell yeah πŸš€βš‘οΈπŸš€βš‘οΈπŸš€βš‘οΈπŸš€βš‘οΈπŸš€

They had so much time to get ready for this. No excuse.

Yes. And it's most.

Unless I misunderstand....don't Ordinal goofs also have to pay said fees?

Sounds like a profitable time for those collecting the fees. Yeah, sucks for the rest of us spoiled by low fees, but it'll equalize. Eventually the monkey funds will decrease and they'll slow down. But, isn't it us basically watching a huge influx of people contributing into bitcoin, even if they are dumb?

Bro have you not figured out that the exchanges are State assets? High fees means more people leave on the exchange. Good for business and State control.

The price of Sovereignty is going up! As it should.

Good take.

Might be the nudge needed.

Sounds easy but it isn’t if one tries to do it noncustodially. Needs to run a node, open a channel, get enough inbound liquidity and pay current on chain fees 2x for that if they haven’t done it when fees were low (and 99% of people who still buy on exchanges most likely didn’t).

I don’t think we can allow ourselves to be content with solving that problem through custodians.

I would love to see the problem solved by LN but it only solves it for people with already large channels and enough inbound liquidity. Which means most people will rely on centralized hubs or custodians if this continues to be the state of the fee market. The question is, how can this be addressed.