Replying to Avatar Hypno Kitty

Isn’t saying that the leading market structure bills could prohibit people from using non-custodial wallets a bit misleading since the Clarity Act now includes section 110, which guarantees the right to self-custody? Is that section somehow in greater jeopardy than the entire bill? My concern is that this messaging will lead people to oppose the Clarity Act, which in its present form DOES protect self-custody. Or am I missing something here?
Avatar
Matt Corallo 6mo ago

As it currently exists it’s great, but it’s also entirely possible that it gets amended either on the floor of the house or in the senate (assuming it makes it that far).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

e2
Wonteet Zebugs 6mo ago

Oh ok, good to know. Thank you.

Avatar
Hypno Kitty 6mo ago

Thanks for the clarification. I’ll let my reps know not to mess with section 110