e2
Wonteet Zebugs
e217899785048ee15da66ab1c4633b8679d141e96c526017d5e7b1991ce584b9
Freedom-loving Bitcoin and Nostr pleb. No bugs, no pods.

Ginger, ginger, ginger. Grate frozen ginger (lots of it) and pour boiling water on it. Breathe in for a couple of minutes and then drink. Repeat a couple of times daily. Watch the miracles happen.

Also, Xlear ( = saline + xylitol + grapefruit seed extract) is your friend.

Yes... but we're just a small part of the funding. The actual funding is the money printing.

I heard about this really cool internet magic money and it's all open source. But I wouldn't touch it because I hear it was made by a pseudonym and we don't know who it was ...

/sarc

OGs bought into bitcoin as money but Core with v30 wants bitcoin to be a jpg relay network.

On a completely unrelated note, gold and monero pumped.

But since it'll take years to have a good solution implemented, we better start now.

I don't want any quantum solution to be replacing our current elliptic curve, just added to it. That way, any btc sent to a quantum-resistant address would require both signatures to be spent. The btc in old addresses, should never be consfiscated and always usable with the same old signatures.

We would get a choice : pay more fees to use an additional (big) signature or go cheap and cross your fingers.

I understand how your face might look like that if it's her right time of the month... but how did she manage that? That's some flexibility right there.

And after getting used to linux, I suggest also taking a look at a systemd-free linux distribution. Artix linux is looking good.

I'm not worried about the 10$ in my bank account being stolen by quantum.

I'm not worried about quantum for sha-256.

I am worried about the quantum risks for the elliptic curve for my only asset (btc), which can not be insured and no one would ever pay me back, no matter how many lawsuits I file and no matter how blue in the face I get.

# The Truth About Intimacy That Nobody Tells Men

Brother, I need to tell you something I learned the hard way, and it might save you years of pain.

The intimacy you think is possible? It's nowhere near what's actually available to you.

Most men are walking around thinking they understand connection. They don't. They're operating at 10% capacity and calling it a relationship.

The kind of intimacy I'm talking about changes how you walk through the world. It heals old wounds. It moves trauma out of your body. It gives you real confidence—the kind that shows up as calm, grounded presence. The kind people feel when you enter a room.

There's one requirement for that level of intimacy:

Safety.

Not romance. Not communication skills. Not date nights.

Safety.

# Here's the uncomfortable part most men miss:

Most women have never felt emotionally safe. Not consistently. Not deeply.

Women live with a baseline sense of unsafety that most men never experience.

When was the last time you felt physically threatened by a woman? For most of us, the answer is never.

For women? It's Tuesday.

Elevators. Parking garages. Long hallways. First dates. Every new man is a question mark.

So when she enters a relationship, her nervous system is already on alert. And every time you react to her emotions, her body logs you as unsafe.

She might not say anything. But her nervous system does.

Over time, your presence becomes something she braces against.

That's not intimacy. That's tolerance.

# The real test is simple:

When your partner is emotional, does she feel safer as the conversation goes on, or more guarded?

You don't need to answer me. Just be honest with yourself.

Most men see emotions as a threat. As an attack. As something to defend against or fix.

Wrong.

Her emotions are communication. And every time you react to them instead of regulate, you're telling her body: "I'm not safe."

# Here's what changed everything for me:

When she's emotional, I breathe. I slow down. I regulate myself.

I stop defending.

I stop correcting.

I stop reacting.

I get curious.

"What's going on?"

"Tell me more."

"What else is there?"

The more emotional she gets, the better. That means energy is moving. Something is being released.

When she's done, I don't fix anything. I thank her.

I thank her for trusting me.

For her vulnerability.

For letting me see her.

That's containment.

And when a woman feels held like that, something changes.

She relaxes. She softens. She opens.

When she can surrender emotionally, she can surrender to you. She can feel more with you. She can trust you. She can desire you.

# And if she doesn't want to have sex with you?

It's not a preference. It's a symptom.

Her nervous system doesn't feel safe.

And no amount of initiating, negotiating, or being nice will override that.

Sex doesn't disappear because she doesn't desire you. Sex disappears because her body can't relax with you.

Everything changed when I stopped trying to fix her emotions and started regulating myself. When I learned to stay grounded while she was emotional. When I held my center instead of leaking it.

That's masculine containment.

Containment creates safety.

Safety allows softening.

Softening allows desire.

#The red-pill crowd has it backwards:

nostr:nprofile1qqsr26r4lltjnvrwadxp67ns58m4qpzaqemhf5sup7hlujhjh7t296qpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uq3qamnwvaz7tmwduh8xarj9e3hytcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp03tnx6p basically tells you dating is war. That women are gatekeepers. That you need to "level up" and compete.

Scientifically, this destroys connection. It heightens fear. It blocks the social openness required for healthy relationships.

What women actually want isn't complicated:

- Kindness

- Humor

- Stability

- Communication

- Safety

- A man who shows up

None of this requires wealth or status. It requires you to get in your body, regulate your nervous system, and build the capacity to hold space under emotional pressure.

Women of nostr, am I right or wrong here?

Men of nostr, you might wanna listen up...

#masculinity #relationships #intimacy #emotionalintelligence #bitcoin #nostr #grownostr

Men have higher sex drives than women do. Just learn to accept that.

You think you found the cheat code? Maybe for a while. But over time, you'll see. Women's sex drives fluctuate. Ours is at 11 on a permanent basis until we die.

Strong (really really strong) ginger tea. You freeze the ginger and then grate it. Pour boiling water. Breathe it in for a couple of minutes and then drink it. Three cups a day. Works wonders.

Is it even open source? They talk about being open and all, but I can't find the link to download it. They also talk about licenses?

Plus, it uses systemd. I'm trying to get out of systemd, not more into it.

On (1) : absolutely, and I wouldn't want bitcoin to replace ECC with PQ algos. I would want PQ algos added. So, if I choose to transfer to an address that also uses a PQ algo, I would then need to sign with ECC *and* with that PQ algo. For big amounts, I wouldn't want to risk it being at the mercy of a technological advancement.

On (2) : higher fees : if bitcoin Core wants to consider that, there is a lot of work to do in making it harder for spam data to price out actual monetary transactions. The higher fees argument might have hit harder last year but v30 changed that (on top of what taproot and segwit did). They even changed the definition of bitcoin to make it into a jpg network instead of p2p money.

On (3) : on killing cheap nodes : again, same as with (2), v30 pretty much affirms that Core doesn't care about that. They'll have us relay whatever spam spammers want to spam us with. Pruning is not an interesting option because it kills archival nodes and kills electrum servers.

If we fix the bad incentives to spam the network with non-monetary transactions (thereby limiting the undue competition for blockspace), we can afford to protect the network by giving the option (for those who prefer that) to also have a PQ algo in addition to ECC.

That might actually make blockspace more competitive, while keep bitcoin a p2p money network, and might be good long-term for the network when the mining needs to run only on miner fees.

Many serious people are saying that quantum will be a threat. I'm not technically competent enough to know one way or the other. But giving what's at stake, adding an optional (additional) PQ seems to be the way to go.

I see that he's starting his own shitcoin : https://dark.fi/

"DarkFi is a new Layer 1 blockchain, designed with anonymity at the forefront." https://codeberg.org/darkrenaissance/darkfi and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_Taaki

So bitcoin is not good enough for him, monero is not good enough for him.

I remember how he just abandoned his darkwallet project. I'm not holding my breath for anything to come out of this either.

I listened starting at 49mns for a couple of minutes and he's just rambling that the lightning guys were lying, and he keeps repeating that. I was waiting for a little bit more meat on those argument bones. He says now he'll just challenge them to fight him physically... That didn't convince me of anything.

In my book, he's insane.

He went to fight ISIS, which to me indicates that he understands very little of what is actually going on in the world.

And in went to Rojova to do that. Rojova = Kurds. Kurds still do excision (female mutilation).

That this guy (Amir Taaki) would still be considered even remotely relevant blows my mind.

From my understanding :

- the crypto used for extra privacy makes it harder to audit the total supply of coins,

- the coin emission schedule (inflation),

- frequent hard forks, which increases the dependency on the main devs (although that fear for monero feels a little overblown comparatively since bitcoin core v30),

- limited options for second layers, which presents a problem for future scaling in case of massive adoption, and

- the choice of preventing ASICs which limits the total hashing power of the network, making reorgs more likely.

Those are the main concerns that come to mind right now.

Replying to Avatar Zsubmariner

PSA: The quantum apocalypse isn't coming

A cryptographically-relevant quantum computer is physically impossible: real hardware hits a fundamental back-reaction limit at a few hundred high-fidelity logical qubits due to size-dependent noise from the error-correction process itself. Shor on 256-bit ECDSA requires thousands to tens of thousands of near-perfect ones. The gap is physical and insurmountable.

The actual use-cases for “quantum computers” are:

- Gassing up investors with science jargon

- Building a regulatory moat

- Scaring people away from battle-tested open-source cryptography

Implementing quantum resistance would be very bad for Bitcoin:

- Dilithium2 / Dilithium3 in P2TR

- Falcon-512 / Falcon-1024 in P2TR

- SPHINCS+-128f in P2TR

- ECDSA + Dilithium2 hybrid (legacy/SegWit/Taproot)

- ECDSA + Falcon-512 hybrid (legacy/SegWit/Taproot)

- New lattice or hash-based spend paths

- New QR address formats / commitments

- Signature size 9–240× larger

- Pubkey size 27–40× larger

- Typical spend 15–50× higher fees forever

- Witness data 15–50× bigger

- UTXO set 10–20× larger within years

- Validation time 5–20× slower

- Far more complex code, not battle tested

- Permanently higher fees (15–50× per tx)

- Lightning channel closes 15–50× more expensive

- Pruning nodes die (UTXO bloat kills them)

- Full-node storage +10–20× in a few years

- Increased centralization pressure

- Permanent consensus & DoS risk increase

- New critical bugs and side-channels

Some of the work people are doing to show that we COULD add QR, IF we needed to, is probably helpful to fight the FUD. But don't buy the hype and don't get bullied by the quantum mafia hype machine.

#Bitcoin

nostr:nevent1qqs0qdwd56eqmehe8n8py0r6p7ccz7t7hc3p7wu050xs4fqf54y7c6gzyqzvj9w6alhrsvtl5u6ygjkwuwg2sf5lukqskgjpuhnd6dpal0kvjqcyqqqqqqg24d2n5

> A cryptographically-relevant quantum computer is physically impossible

Lord Kelvin : "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."

As bitcoiners, we can't be bearish on tech.

Why not simply ADD quantum resistance? Not removing the current scheme, just adding quantum resistance as an optional extra for those who are willing to pay the extra fee.

For small amounts, I'm okay with receiving and sending a hot potato.

But when moving sats to my cold storage "pension fund", I'd be more than willing to pay more in fees to cover the extra quantum resistance.

As a bitcoiner, I don't feel like risking my family's financial future on your mathematical assurances of impossibility of the quantum threat.

#quantum #bitcoin #btc #QC

You need to hug the tree, not stare at it.

You need to find an old one. At least 400 years old.

If you don't feel calmer after touching a 400 year old tree, I don't know what to tell you.

But I'm also talking about afterwards. I've lost trust in Core. So, even with a soft fork, I feel we need a third implementation going forward. We have to make sure this can't happen again.

Replying to Avatar Shortfiat

I agree with everything that Matt says in this video, with one slight caveat. The way to get the bitcoin that you want is to vote with your money. That is your power.

If the BTC444 fork starts with just 5% of the mining network, then it can start to get traction. The thing that will make the miners switch, is if the price of the new fork is higher than its relative hash power. For example, if the price of BTC444 is 10% of the old btc price and it has only 5% of the hash, then it is twice as profitable for the miners to mine BTC444 rather than the old one.

Miners are economically incentivesed actors, they will produce what people will pay for.

After the fork everyone will have both versions of bitcoin in their wallet. You can sit tight and play it safe, that way you will certainly end up with the winning bitcoin either way.

Alternatively, you can become an active part of shaping the future of bitcion by selling some of your spam chain bitcion for some clean chain bitcoin. It will be quite cheap at first.

Pay for the bitcoin that want to own and miners will produce what you pay for.

This is how capitalism is supposed to work.

The core devs are attempting a coup, but we have the real power.

If you think about how almost all of the OG bitcoin hodlers really don't like ordinals, then you can probably have a good guess as to who is going to win!

Peter Todd hates bitcoin and he wants to tear it all down.

He made a film in which he pretended to be satoshi.

He persistently proposes that we extend bitcoin beyond the 21m limit.

He is bullying the bitcoin core devs into expanding OP_RETURN. I have been to bitdevs meetings and I've seen it happen.

The only thing that we can do with 100KB that we can't do with 80 bytes is put more non financial data on the blockchain.

The CSAM threat is real. That is what central bankers want, it is what governments want, it is what shitcoin projects want and it is what Peter Todd wants.

They want to see bitcion fall.

Thank you nostr:nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qppamhxue69uhku6n4d4czumt99uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep026j8ly for highlighting this topic for us.

nostr:nevent1qqspssgnjsucku9vwtc3mu0px065mmvmlkc99tnvl8hxm00ta5nhy2gzyzzxxpmg3gy7cyffvl4s2388320g33y02pcjcw0dfy0l9dh6qxdwsqcyqqqqqqguksfgx

Who do we have who's working on a third implementation?

Core has gone rogue and Luke is pro-covenants, which I'm not.

Is there any third implementation that would simply be conservative? Just keeping bitcoin the way it was before the horror of v30 (and possibly v29) ?

We just need good stewards to be there in cases of dramatic bugs that could mess up the network (and potentially something for quantum down the line).

#core #knots #node #bitcoin #btc

I don't know if they can require it in Japan. They can require it in the US, in Canada, in the UK, in Australia, and many others.

In Canada, I believe they would just seize the device if you don't give them the password. In the UK and in Australia, I believe they send you to jail...

Conclusion : no electronic device when flying.

By the way, do you know if you can opt-out of the body scanner in Japanese airports? I believe you can in Europe, Canada and in the US. You can choose to get a pat-down instead. But I don't know about Japan. Any thoughts?

I'll never understand why some people find cosmetic surgery to be a plus (barring a totally disfiguring injury).

"We've Become Serfs On Our Own Land": The USDA Trap, Foreign Land Sales, And The Collapse Of American Farming

https://www.zerohedge.com/food/weve-become-serfs-our-own-land-usda-trap-foreign-land-sales-and-collapse-american-farming

> "I can't even legally sell what I grow on my farm to any of my friends, family, or neighbors," Sagdal says. Why? Because of USDA slaughter rules. With few exceptions, unless meat is processed at a USDA-inspected facility, and labeled with a USDA stamp, it's illegal to sell. An issue compounded by the fact that just four companies have monopolized the few meatpacking plants that still exist.

#beef #farms #USDA #BeefInitiative #WEF

His position on Palestine may have been enough to get him across the finish line, to send a message.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohran_Mamdani

> Mamdani supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement. He has denounced Israel's actions during the Gaza war, calling them acts of genocide.

Respectfully asking and very interested in the Japan btc situation :

- Is it not possible to live on btc in Japan? Meetups, a good network of friends, for p2p to get whatever fiat you need for vendors who refuse btc?

- I hear that Japan is still strong on cash so shouldn't there be a way to be basically in btc and cash only?